Charging for boiler fault finding

[cr0ft]

Folks,

Do you charge for time spent diagnosing boiler faults? I believe it should be charged for but it seems a lot of customers expect me to be doing this for free like quotes.. Clearly there are two appointments involved, diagnosis and repair usually.

What do you all do?

 

[rpm]

Charge for the diagnosing but don`t say exactly what the problem is otherwise the customer goes and buys the part(s) but tell them the visit is foc or at a reduced cost if they accept the quote and you return to complete the job then factor it in to your quote.

 

[quality]

for me its my hourly rate

 

[rpm]

for me its my hourly rate

I try and offer the carrot to entice the donkey to come my way. lol

 

[rocketmanbkk]

Charge

 

[Best]

Charge for it! You don't go privately to a consultant for diagnosis of your illness and then expect only to pay for the next visit for treatment, - do you?

 

[rpm]

Charge

I`m saying charge and offering the enticement to get the job then adding the reduction made back in to the quote in such a way that the customer can`t see it so it`s a win win situation unless you don`t want the job of course.

 

[quality]

when boilers are broke and your there looking at what the problem is its very rare (never in my experience) that you don't get the job of repairing it

 

[rpm]

when boilers are broke and your there looking at what the problem is its very rare (never in my experience) that you don't get the job of repairing it

Good on yer however how many times have we heard of customers buying and fitting the part themselves or getting their friend to do the job once they know what the fault is if anyone is daft enough to tell them which I`m sure you don`t.

 

[quality]

that's not unheard of. I posted the other day about a similar scenario which end with a boiler change

 

[rpm]

Hope you got the boiler change mate.

 

[quality]

I did mate after a bit of a stand off from the DIY specialist

 

[Millsy 82]

Good on yer however how many times have we heard of customers buying and fitting the part themselves or getting their friend to do the job once they know what the fault is if anyone is daft enough to tell them which I`m sure you don`t.

I can't recall ever having that once.

 

[rpm]

I can't recall ever having that once.

It does happen though doesn`t it, once they know which part is faulty.

 

[REDSAW]

i dont charge for looking with my eyes.

if i take the cover off or get it working then i have worked on the boiler which is a flat hour charge!
if its then a quote for repair say fan, then i knock it of the price then add the hour to the part price.

 

[plumbdoctor]

Think you have to judge the custard if you think you may be getting turned over then it's very easy to give them a quote and tell them the wrong part ;-) if they go with it then just arrive with the correct parts. I see this as a win win, but I don't really have the problems of people doing this to me. But I'm aware it is quite common.

 

[woodsy]

Definitely charge for both, experience and knowledge has cost you money to learn. Unless the fault can be made good in the initial diagnosis, then it's one fee for diagnosis, especially if tools have to come out and another for repair. Take your van in and ask the garage to carry out exploratory work on a fault and then not charge you and wait for the answer. Too many people allowing their skills to be devalued by giving time and knowledge away.

 

[jonnyswamp]

I wouldn't visit if it was just to diagnose, only go if I carry out the repair
Most just want their boiler up and running again and don't want 3 quotes like a larger job

 

[rpm]

Definitely charging for 2 visits just saying you can be seen to be a nice man whilst collecting all the money.

 

[hammers4spanner]

I charge 50 quid to look at boiler no matter what , separate charge for repair.

Got one trying it on at the moment tho so see how that pans out

 

[jtsplumbing]

Done work for company's in the past all charge for dialogistic work usely first hr or call out charge. you have to cover you overheads,

 

[village idiot]

I wouldn't visit if it was just to diagnose, only go if I carry out the repair
Most just want their boiler up and running again and don't want 3 quotes like a larger job

I'm yet to come across a customer who wants more than 1 person to quote for a repair? As said, they just want their boiler working (except those internet sites - Mybuilder, Check-a-trade, etc). Like Redshaw, I do not charge if I have my habds in my pocket and just have a look. Once I take off cover or use tools to aid diagnosis, I charge

 

[SimonG]

With boiler faults its either I'm coming to fix it or you'll be getting somebody else. Don't see the point in saying I'll charge £50 to tell you what's wrong and £xx to fix it when it can all be lumped into one.

Although you could make a fortune.

 

[stevetheplumber]

i quite like the idea of charging for diagnosis and then letting someone else do it no chance it will be you thats lumbered with a spare pcb
i charge to hourly to fix, if its beyond economical repair then i charge the hour quote to replace and agree if i replace it i will discount the hours money providing youve diagnosed the problem correctly parts cost is irrelevant as who ever does it has to supply the same parts
if a customer is humming and arring i sometimes throw in a max labour charge of 3 hours for any repair

 

[cr0ft]

To those of you who charge to repair on the first appointment, how do you know with certainty what's wrong with the boiler if you haven't seen it first? Do you keep loads of spares in your van?