Advice on converting from Gravity Fed to Fully Pumped. | UK Plumbers Forums | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss Advice on converting from Gravity Fed to Fully Pumped. in the UK Plumbers Forums area at Plumbers Forums

Messages
10
OK, time served aerospace engineer here.
Here's my query.

Mums house has a very old floor standing boiler - HW is gravity fed, CH is pumped. F/E is in the return pipe of the HW loop.

I live a long way away, so have to deal with it remotely, otherwise i'd be doing it myself.

Boiler has been condemned, and plumber is only too keen to rip out the hot water tank and fit a Combination boiler.
Price is coming out at £2800, which seems OK for all this work, but I personally dislike combi boilers, and I think my old mum would struggle to manage with the slow hot water flow rate and delayed nature of the hot water.

Also, where the boiler lives (in an exterior utility room) is far from the hot water taps in the house, so it would take a calendar month for the hot water to come through from a combi mounted there.

Anyway, I've challenged the plumber who condemned the boiler to fit a standard boiler, and make the HW a pumped system with a 3 way valve.
His response is that he would have to change all the gravity pipes, so the cost would be about the same.

I'm not fully convinced.

The boiler has 4 pipes going to it, so both the HW and CH loops come out at the boiler.
Why is it not possible to put the three way valve next to the boiler, rather than next to the cylinder?
Am I missing anything?

I did think that wiring the cylinder stat to the three way valve could be a problem, but there are wireless thermostats available.

Anyway, answers on a postcard please...

Thanks,

Mike.
 
Course it can be done rf controls will do it I did one a while back
 

Attachments

  • 20180413_143654.jpg
    20180413_143654.jpg
    70.1 KB · Views: 51
  • 20180413_152919.jpg
    20180413_152919.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 49
  • 20180409_093124.jpg
    20180409_093124.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 42
  • 20180409_092357.jpg
    20180409_092357.jpg
    82.6 KB · Views: 45
If you put a system boiler in (as above) then there should be no major issue. Maybe he is thinking you want a regular boiler and for it to remain an open vented system. That would not be as straight forward. I suspect that your vent is off the flow to the cylinder and as you said the cold feed is in the return. In that case, the position of the pump, cold feed and vent all need to be re-arranged a bit and you would probably need to run another pipe.

There is nothing wrong with the set up above though, that's probably the way I would go.

You might need to replace the cylinder but not necessarily. I haven't seen it.
 
If you put a system boiler in (as above) then there should be no major issue. Maybe he is thinking you want a regular boiler and for it to remain an open vented system. That would not be as straight forward. I suspect that your vent is off the flow to the cylinder and as you said the cold feed is in the return. In that case, the position of the pump, cold feed and vent all need to be re-arranged a bit and you would probably need to run another pipe.

There is nothing wrong with the set up above though, that's probably the way I would go.

You might need to replace the cylinder but not necessarily. I haven't seen it.
Could still use the primary's for the current cylinder for the F&R for an open bent then pipe the F&E at the cylinder position.
 
Could still use the primary's for the current cylinder for the F&R for an open bent then pipe the F&E at the cylinder position.
Thats exactly what i was thinking.
[automerge]1574449454[/automerge]
Thank you so much your speedy answers.
I'm not getting compelling answers from the current plumber, so I'm getting a Worcester Bosch approved fitter in for a second opinion.
[automerge]1574452018[/automerge]
Thank you again for this help.

I've been sending text messages to the plumber, and your clear responses have given me the confidence to challenge the current plumber on his advice.

He has not actually answered my queries, but instead has called my old mum "to check that the install is on for Thursday".

I try to see the best in people, and maybe he's simply trying to keep mum happy and fix it quickly, but I can't help feeling that he can't really answer the difficult questions, so he leans on the soft link in the chain...

I'm a bit surprised, because many people talk highly about him - he came highly recommended, but I'm feeling a bit uneasy about him, and I've got more quotes coming in.
 
Last edited:

Similar plumbing topics

  • Question
On the time to wash per dog, one minute would...
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Question
OK thanks for the response. I hadn't...
Replies
5
Views
786
  • Question
Dab easy sys tank and pump, 210-250 unvented...
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Question
Many thanks for your advice I will get up into...
Replies
3
Views
419
  • Question
Many thanks, I have a probe thermometer so...
Replies
2
Views
605
Back
Top