Changed Shower Head Caused Flood? | Showers and Wetrooms Advice | Plumbers Forums

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss Changed Shower Head Caused Flood? in the Showers and Wetrooms Advice area at Plumbers Forums

R

ricefran

I'm new to this forum and I thank everyone in advance for any insights..

I'm a tenant living in a house. The landlord lives on the 2nd floor. The main floor is divided into 2 units. I live in one of the units.

Recently the landlord told me about water leak in the other unit and it's probably due to our bathtub problem. The landlord just purchased this house for less than 1 year so he still has warranty from the builder.

Today the builder came and checked the bathtub. He said the leak is caused by the shower head. The shower head is missing a gasket in the junction so it's leaking. We did notice a leak in the junction when we first install it, but we thought it's ok because the water is leaking into the drain anyway.

What I don't understand is how is it possible that a leak in the shower head that goes into the tub would cause water leaking into the other unit? The landlord claims that they pulled the floor up on the other unit because it's all damaged. They said we should tell them about changing the shower head. Now they want us to pay for fixing the floor in the other unit and they haven't collected rent for the whole month.

I'm trying to understand if it's possible that changing a shower head would cause so much damage and whether we are liable for that. Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
I assume your showerhead is on a hose. Without the washer, water will have run down the back wall and if you have a shower curtain it will have run off the side of the bath and onto the floor. I can't understand however that you have never noticed this. A lot of water can quickly escape this way. Over a sustained period of time, it is quie possible for damage to occur.

However if you have a shower screen then it should have stopped the water and sent it back to the bath.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
hmmm

I beg to differ

Without the Hose washer it would drip along the hose to the valve but this should be sealed and all water escape down the drain

Bath curtain should be inside the bath so drips go into bath

Dodgy seal on shower valve and or bath would obviously cause the leak but dont think that would be you fault
 
Upvote 0
Thanks everyone for chipping in some comments, greatly appreciated.

The bath uses screen and I just checked it is sealed.

I suspect maybe the valve and/or the hose was not seal on the back wall. Now I'm wondering if a professional builder should sealed those areas?

I'm still trying to figure out who's liable for what. Thanks again for any help!
 
Upvote 0
you mention a landlord so i imagine you pay rent, its up to the landlord to sort it out for you. he takes your money each month so its up to him to sort out. being his building.

It does sound like the seal behinde the taps has gone. it should have been done when the building was built.
 
Upvote 0
you mention a landlord so i imagine you pay rent, its up to the landlord to sort it out for you. he takes your money each month so its up to him to sort out. being his building.

It does sound like the seal behinde the taps has gone. it should have been done when the building was built.

OH! There is no seal at all behind the hose and tap. Sounds like I'm not liable at all. I think I can relax for now.

I have a landlord and he wants to resolve this by asking me for money to fix his problem :mad:

i would have thought that the landlord would be responsible for the upkeep of the rented property.

My biggest concern is the money he asks me to pay, not the leaky shower head. He wants me to pay for the floor damage in the other unit because he said I shouldn't have changed the shower head and if I do, I should tell him in advance. He claims because I changed the shower head causing the leak, I'm paying him the cost for changing the floor in the other unit and loss of one month rent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
thats why there is a seal behind the taps, incase splashback or for what ever reason. he has no right to charge you for it. check your contract you signed when you took out the lease.

I had a landlord who tried to charge me for damages made by my flat mate after i moved out, he also tried to keep my deposit. dont let your landlord bully you. he takes money from you each month.
 
Upvote 0
4335390475_5e13360983_m.jpg


4336136502_0b52b685bc_m.jpg


4335392825_977922f26e_m.jpg



Today I went to the other unit to take some pictures. The floors are pulled up.

The landlord told me water was leaking in the joint (the white part in the picture above) and water travelled up the arm attached on the wall and went inside the wall and to the other unit.

With the original shower head put back on, I asked a friend to splash water to the wall and I was observing in the other unit. Apparently there is no leak..
 
Upvote 0
The water probably went behind the mixer valve which probably isn't sealed properly. Nothing to do with what you have done.

Your landlord is talking rubbish. Even the arm should be sealed where it joins the wall.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
id get a local plumber (of your choice he'll no doubt know a few) to come and check it - i cant see how he thinks its your fault, even if you have changed the head - and it has leaked from the join, the back plate for the mixer should of been sealed, he is probably saying its running down the tiles and onto the mixer plate, but a proper installation would of sealed the mixer and it would of run around this into the bath, the whole point of sealing all components on a shower wall is to avoid this scenario.

do not give into him, im fed up of bullying landlords! they buy these houses up cheap, minimum maintenance and try to blame everyone else!!!!
 
Upvote 0
Greatly appreciate everyone's help. This issue is pretty much resolved (on my side). After the builder came to change the original shower head on, water was still leaking. So now the landlord knows it's not because of the shower head. And the builder cut open the tile to fix the problem, so now it looks like this..
4348510656_dca7200d33_m.jpg


The landlord is really a pig. They are a young couple. Actually, the husband is a computer programmer geek, the wife is a pig. When I try to talk to them it's not my fault causing the water leak, the wife brought her computer mic to shower me how it IS possible. I told her I had a plumber checked the problem and he said it's not the shower head. She continued to say it's a slow progress how water leaking out blah blah blah.. Then I only made three statements:
1. I don't agree it is my fault.
2. I will go to court to resolve this matter
3. If I'm not liable in the end, I will sue for losses of enjoyment in life due to her accusation causing stress and related symptoms.

Then as though she got a slap in the face and widen her eyes asking "so your plumber said it's not the shower head?"

Last but not least, thanks everyone's comments. Without the suggestions here I'd be so afraid thinking I might be liable for all this crap. Thank you very much!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Similar plumbing topics

  • Question
i can't tell if my shower tap (cock stop) is...
Replies
0
Views
471
D
  • Question
Our master bath shower had two shower heads...
Replies
0
Views
600
DianaCali
D
J
    • Like
  • Question
Hi, did you ever solve this problem? You...
Replies
1
Views
623
  • Question
Try putting a flow restrictor in each outlet 7...
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Question
i once had a customer who asked for it to be...
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top