ferrolli sigma 40/69 system boiler co level v high | Boilers | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss ferrolli sigma 40/69 system boiler co level v high in the Boilers area at Plumbers Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
L

lame plumber

found a sigma 40/60 during a service that had v high co output, fga not happy. Cleaned everything down check gas rate, bp etc etc still .007+ so rang ferrolli engineer i know. He remembers a tech warning years ago re vertical flues on these stating that you should only use horizontal flues as they were failing to remove pocs, but a kit was available to range rate them down, ie produce less fumes! My only other thoughts were failing fan but aps allowing burner to light ok or installer didnt put in larger flue reducing ring supplied with fan/flue on installation. anyone else come across this situ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
found a sigma 40/60 during a service that had v high co output, fga not happy. Cleaned everything down check gas rate, bp etc etc still .007+ so rang ferrolli engineer i know. He remembers a tech warning years ago re vertical flues on these stating that you should only use horizontal flues as they were failing to remove pocs, but a kit was available to range rate them down, ie produce less fumes! My only other thoughts were failing fan but aps allowing burner to light ok or installer didnt put in larger flue reducing ring supplied with fan/flue on installation. anyone else come across this situ?

0.0070 is acceptable if your done a full strip down service. If the gas rate and burner pressure and flame picture are good and the MI's don't state otherwise on the readings then I'd say it was ok.
Id have a check of the flue ways while I was there and and if they where good and I'd done everything physically possible to try and improve the readings then I'd be pretty happy leaving it be.
 
0.0070 is acceptable if your done a full strip down service. If the gas rate and burner pressure and flame picture are good and the MI's don't state otherwise on the readings then I'd say it was ok.
Id have a check of the flue ways while I was there and and if they where good and I'd done everything physically possible to try and improve the readings then I'd be pretty happy leaving it be.

thanks for that, prehaps I should have said .007 and continuing to rise when the fga bailed out, leaving me to reset it twice. Flue clear, intake part reading 0 on CO/Co2 and 20.9 on O2 so main problem is pocs arent being cleared. So according to regs on cpa an id situ, but boiler been working for 8 years like this as last 2 services engineer didnt quote fga readings so prob dint have an fga.

Currently awaiting answer fm engineers at ferrolli, and will take it fm there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar plumbing topics

  • Locked
Not if its a pro they don't use...
Replies
7
Views
167
  • Locked
Well done subby. It will be the first of many...
Replies
12
Views
250
Back
Top