S
sinaloa
Hi,
I wonder if someone will help me resolve conflicting advice from various plumbers regarding the replacement of my old hot water cylinder (20+ years old) which has begun to leak. I had a 14 Kw Ecodan fitted last year (thats a whole other story!!!) but retained my old cylinder in a vented system.
The installers of the system originally recommended that we convert to an unvented system when the hot water cylinder needed replacement but are now recommending that they replace the old hot water cylinder with an unvented 300l Megaflo but used in our vented system and with the two coils "plumbed together" to improve recovery time. If I were to go this route it seems that the Elson Zircon 300 or a Plumbase "badged" version would be a much cheaper alternative with the same benefits?
Would there be any benefits from converting to an unvented system - we have shower pumps installed so don't have pressure problems in the house? And the loft tanks are not a problem.
Other plumbers who I have contacted have suggested that the bespoke cylinder from Gledhill with a single coil with a 34 Kw output would be more suitable but I can work out the comparison in heatup times and economy from plumbing together two coils in a cheaper dual coil cylinder. The price differentials seem considerable. They have recommended keeping the vented system.
Ideally I would like to have two horizontal immersion heaters but that is not a deal breaker.
Thanks in advance for any guidance/recommendations
I wonder if someone will help me resolve conflicting advice from various plumbers regarding the replacement of my old hot water cylinder (20+ years old) which has begun to leak. I had a 14 Kw Ecodan fitted last year (thats a whole other story!!!) but retained my old cylinder in a vented system.
The installers of the system originally recommended that we convert to an unvented system when the hot water cylinder needed replacement but are now recommending that they replace the old hot water cylinder with an unvented 300l Megaflo but used in our vented system and with the two coils "plumbed together" to improve recovery time. If I were to go this route it seems that the Elson Zircon 300 or a Plumbase "badged" version would be a much cheaper alternative with the same benefits?
Would there be any benefits from converting to an unvented system - we have shower pumps installed so don't have pressure problems in the house? And the loft tanks are not a problem.
Other plumbers who I have contacted have suggested that the bespoke cylinder from Gledhill with a single coil with a 34 Kw output would be more suitable but I can work out the comparison in heatup times and economy from plumbing together two coils in a cheaper dual coil cylinder. The price differentials seem considerable. They have recommended keeping the vented system.
Ideally I would like to have two horizontal immersion heaters but that is not a deal breaker.
Thanks in advance for any guidance/recommendations