Hi All,
New here and first post.
Currently working with a client on a refurb in Spain and would appreciate your thoughts.
The client has a new 500L tank that is currently heated via a boiler and some (defunct) solar panels. He would like to change this method to ASHP and new solar which is no problem. However, he will be installing U/F heating and cooling and would like to integrate this.
Proposed ASHP unit is 14kW Viesmann Vitocal 100-A which is sufficient for the U/F heating/cooling. The existing tank (Sonnenkraft DHW500R2) has all required connections for the required DHW system and I think that this could be modified to include the U/F requirements.
I have attached a simple schematic showing the proposed basic layout (excluding expansions, safety/strainers/bleed points etc).
Operating philosophy is as follows:
Summer.
The hot water is heated primarily through the solar panels, any requirement for rapid top up would be through the heat pump.
The underfloor cooling would be provided by the heat pump. Solar panels would be disconnected via the 3 way valves.
Winter:
Underfloor heating would be provided by a combination of both solar gain and heat pump. Should the sun not shine, the heat pump is correctly sized to provide the total loading required.
Hot Water:
At all times this would be prioritised. Solar when available, heat pump when necessary.
The system has been designed to interface with the proposed heat pump and solar pumping station. I have attempted to ensure that it is not over complicated and that in the event of any problems the systems could be isolated in order to ensure that hot water would be available. Basically, all will be monitored through temperature sensors in the tanks and solar array and will be controlled by a small logic block which could be taken out of circuit if required. Not quite dual redundancy but a system that can be easily reconfigured in case of any emergency or breakdown.
I then sent this over to one of our suppliers and received their response, (see second attachment).
Seems rather OTT to me. What do you guys think?
Many Thanks
Patrick
New here and first post.
Currently working with a client on a refurb in Spain and would appreciate your thoughts.
The client has a new 500L tank that is currently heated via a boiler and some (defunct) solar panels. He would like to change this method to ASHP and new solar which is no problem. However, he will be installing U/F heating and cooling and would like to integrate this.
Proposed ASHP unit is 14kW Viesmann Vitocal 100-A which is sufficient for the U/F heating/cooling. The existing tank (Sonnenkraft DHW500R2) has all required connections for the required DHW system and I think that this could be modified to include the U/F requirements.
I have attached a simple schematic showing the proposed basic layout (excluding expansions, safety/strainers/bleed points etc).
Operating philosophy is as follows:
Summer.
The hot water is heated primarily through the solar panels, any requirement for rapid top up would be through the heat pump.
The underfloor cooling would be provided by the heat pump. Solar panels would be disconnected via the 3 way valves.
Winter:
Underfloor heating would be provided by a combination of both solar gain and heat pump. Should the sun not shine, the heat pump is correctly sized to provide the total loading required.
Hot Water:
At all times this would be prioritised. Solar when available, heat pump when necessary.
The system has been designed to interface with the proposed heat pump and solar pumping station. I have attempted to ensure that it is not over complicated and that in the event of any problems the systems could be isolated in order to ensure that hot water would be available. Basically, all will be monitored through temperature sensors in the tanks and solar array and will be controlled by a small logic block which could be taken out of circuit if required. Not quite dual redundancy but a system that can be easily reconfigured in case of any emergency or breakdown.
I then sent this over to one of our suppliers and received their response, (see second attachment).
Seems rather OTT to me. What do you guys think?
Many Thanks
Patrick