This caught my eye yesterday... can we believe any manufacturers compliance "claims"?
The Times report overstates the case IMHO. I don’t know how British manufacturers calculate efficiency, but if the Germans can base it on 35°C flow temperature, presumably the Brits could also. And while that might be unrealistic if the weather is cold, it could be OK for moderate conditions if the rad area is generous.
In any case, if the claimed efficiency is higher than the actual, it doesn’t follow that it’s costing users extra money, assuming various suppliers use the same basis and don’t tell lies. It’s true that the fuel cost is higher than it would have been if the claimed efficiency had been met, so if someone estimates his costs based on claimed efficiency, his bills will be higher than expected. But the actual efficiency is what it is, and for a given level of comfort, that determines the amount of fuel used.
That of course is based on average boiler efficiency over the whole housing stock, not saying that efficiencies can’t be improved.