Plastic Central Heating Filters TF1 is metal better? | Central Heating Forum | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss Plastic Central Heating Filters TF1 is metal better? in the Central Heating Forum area at Plumbers Forums

Messages
83
I have a Fernox TF1 made of plastic. It always seems to leak a bit after being serviced and needs the joints tightened up. Occasionally it has leaked quite a lot (enough for a puddle after being unnoticed for a while). I don't like the top cap which has threads that are stiff and awkward (even with silicone grease). Is the metal version any better (TF1 Omega) and does anyone know if it's a straight swap without alteration of the existing isolators (in other words does it drop straight in to an existing TF1 plastic installation).

It's this one: The Industry Favourite, Award Winning, TF1 Omega Filter by Fernox
 
Yes straight swap but you need the omega with valves
 
Omega far far better in my opinion the Tf1 is ok if you want a water feature indoors ha ha a common fault I am afraid . kop

20161104_152223.jpg


20161104_124847.jpg


Screenshot_20190514-062751_Photos.jpg
 
Last edited:
The omega is much better.
You don’t need to remove the lid to service the plastic ones.

Yes, I know this but my gas man insists on taking the lid off. I tend to clean out every few months by closing off the valves, removing the magnet, opening the bottom valve over a bucket and then slightly opening the feed side valve which lets the rubbish out into the bucket. It certainly works very well. I had it installed when I had a new boiler some years back and the rubbish it collected was substantial. Now there is much much less.
 
Last edited:
Omega far far better in my opinion the Tf1 is ok if you want a water feature indoors ha ha a common fault I am afraid . kop

View attachment 38832

View attachment 38833

View attachment 38834

That looks a very neat unit. I think I'll wait until the next annual service. I had to have the system partially drained recently and it has only just had the inhibitor replenished so I don't want to waste that. The TF1 is behaving (for now) after a bit of a tighten up.
 
I have replaced the TF1 before with the omega why does it have to be with valves as you posted? just a question

The other ones have compression fittings not flat face threads
 

Similar plumbing topics

Many thanks. Always wondered what they were...
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • Locked
Hi Chuck. Thanks for your kind information...
Replies
5
Views
11K
A
Replies
2
Views
2K
Basically sounds like nothing was set in stone...
Replies
21
Views
6K
Back
Top