R
rf1
Hi, I’m new to the forum, GSRd, and would appreciate any views on the following.
When quoting for boiler replacements, I routinely include for upgrading the existing installation pipe if I get a measured working pressure drop from meter to existing boiler greater than 1mb (on the basis the new boiler will have the same or greater heat input than the existing one) or if pipe sizing calcs for the new boiler and any other existing appliances indicate the existing installation pipe work is likely to be of insufficient size to achieve the required gas rate with a max 1mb drop regardless of whether the existing pipe will actually provide the required minimum inlet pressure specified by the replacement boiler MIs.
Unfortunately, I am often told by the potential customer in these circumstances (particularly where the existing boiler inlet pipe work is22mm) that no one else has mentioned replacing the gas pipe and as a result that’s usually the last I hear of the job.
I believe I am taking the correct approach ( although unfortunately obviously not a winning one ) when quoting for this work, whereby even if the replacement boiler install is in line with MIs as far as inlet pressure, gas rate, fga is concerned, if the pressure drop across the existing installation pipe work from meter to the new boiler inlet is greater than 1mbar then it doesn’t comply with the regs and I would then be responsible for upgrading the existing installation pipework despite the fact the boiler installation itself is actually in line with the MIs.
It appears that the other approach is to install the new boiler on to the existing installation pipe and as long as the boiler installation meets the requirements of the MIs with WP at the meter within acceptable limits, then the work carried out to install the boiler satisfies the requirements of the regs and presumably the existing installation pipe work is then left as an NCS situation due to the pressure loss across it being greater than 1mb but not affecting safe operation of any appliances. Don’t know how GSR view this?
Any experienced views on the matter would be much appreciated.
When quoting for boiler replacements, I routinely include for upgrading the existing installation pipe if I get a measured working pressure drop from meter to existing boiler greater than 1mb (on the basis the new boiler will have the same or greater heat input than the existing one) or if pipe sizing calcs for the new boiler and any other existing appliances indicate the existing installation pipe work is likely to be of insufficient size to achieve the required gas rate with a max 1mb drop regardless of whether the existing pipe will actually provide the required minimum inlet pressure specified by the replacement boiler MIs.
Unfortunately, I am often told by the potential customer in these circumstances (particularly where the existing boiler inlet pipe work is22mm) that no one else has mentioned replacing the gas pipe and as a result that’s usually the last I hear of the job.
I believe I am taking the correct approach ( although unfortunately obviously not a winning one ) when quoting for this work, whereby even if the replacement boiler install is in line with MIs as far as inlet pressure, gas rate, fga is concerned, if the pressure drop across the existing installation pipe work from meter to the new boiler inlet is greater than 1mbar then it doesn’t comply with the regs and I would then be responsible for upgrading the existing installation pipework despite the fact the boiler installation itself is actually in line with the MIs.
It appears that the other approach is to install the new boiler on to the existing installation pipe and as long as the boiler installation meets the requirements of the MIs with WP at the meter within acceptable limits, then the work carried out to install the boiler satisfies the requirements of the regs and presumably the existing installation pipe work is then left as an NCS situation due to the pressure loss across it being greater than 1mb but not affecting safe operation of any appliances. Don’t know how GSR view this?
Any experienced views on the matter would be much appreciated.
Last edited by a moderator: