Going off the economic figures for unemployment, the need for skilled labour to kick start the renewables industry and the fact that this market is not being taken up by sufficient numbers in the BSE sector...then this is a policy aimed at the unemployed, or those wanting to enter the industry.
So would colleges turn people away when they have spent millions on expanding their facilities to deal with large volumes of training?
I think those self employed or unemployed as plumbers without NVQ3 will be welcomed with open arms on this.
In addition, licence to practice is inevitible for plumbing, so NVQ3 will help meet the minimum technical competency MTC laid down by summitskills.
The target skills need laid down by the government policies are intermediate skills (NVQ3), so sooner or later all those who completed NVQ2 will be expected or encouraged to do NVQ3, to brings us into line with skill levels across Europe.
If people are being turned away from NVQ3 because they do not have an employer, this would really surprise me.
I would be interested to know if NVQ3 requires an employer - if so, then why are people doing them without employers (those converting tech certs to NVQs) or are there stricter rules for the QCF/NVQ.