Whole house underfloor heating as only heat source. Yes or No? | Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss Whole house underfloor heating as only heat source. Yes or No? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at Plumbers Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dazboj

I'm having a full house refurb and extensions built and had always been keen to have underfloor heating and no radiators. We don't have any plans for a fire or burner either.

Does anyone have any experience living solely with UFH?
Would you recommend it or should I maybe go with UFH for the large kitchen diner and rads in the bedrooms?
I estimate the house to end up approximately 220m2. How many thousands do think I should put aside for something of this scale.

Thanks
 
Thanks guys. I think I've decided to drop the whole house idea.
I'll probably go for upstairs in 2 bathrooms, and downstairs everywhere except living room as I'd rather have a nice thick pile carpet.
 
I'm having a full house refurb and extensions built and had always been keen to have underfloor heating and no radiators. We don't have any plans for a fire or burner either.

Does anyone have any experience living solely with UFH?
Would you recommend it or should I maybe go with UFH for the large kitchen diner and rads in the bedrooms?
I estimate the house to end up approximately 220m2. How many thousands do think I should put aside for something of this scale.

Thanks

Underfloor heating is perfect for a full house
As long as the calcs work out
House needs to be thermal efficient
And a liquid screed is a very good option
 
UFH throughout - it is suitable floor all floor types / coverings. Much reduced running cost, no rads on walls (other than bathroom towel rails) - no issue with it in bedrooms. Far more comfortable & far easier to control.
 
Absolutely. You can still have your carpet in bedrooms. Carpet companies not have tog ratings for their carpets and underlays. much nicer than unslightly radiators
 
Absolute waste of money in bedrooms.

Why the need for peak or background heating in a room that is either unoccupied or you are wrapped in a 13.5 tog quilt.

Money to burn then crack on. Failing that then rads on a seperate zone for the bedrooms.
 
With those old Victorian properties the first problem you'll have is the insulation. The floors and walls need to be very good insulated otherwise you will have too much heat loss / basically you'd heat for nothing. Like Simon said already is no point of having ufh in bedrooms. Bathrooms and big kitchen are great.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar plumbing topics

I started a long winded response but deleted...
Replies
1
Views
731
N
If it takes ages to heat up I’m guessing due...
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Question
We currently have the ground floor wet UFH and...
Replies
0
Views
828
Back
Top