Boiler keeps short cycling with only UFH is on | Boilers | Plumbers Forums

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Boiler keeps short cycling with only UFH is on

Post thread
Post reply

Discuss Boiler keeps short cycling with only UFH is on in the Boilers area at Plumbers Forums

W

windsor-tg

Messages
42
Good morning, wondered if anyone can advise please on a resolution?

My set up at home is that I have a 4-bed detached with 21 radiators (includes 4 towel rails), a 6m x 4m orangery/conservatory that was built last year with under-floor heating, and a Megaflo for storing hot water. The UFH contains two loops in a screeded floor, each tube loop in the floor to the manifold is approx 60m long.

Last year, I had all my radiators changed (unfortunately I did not have the system fully flushed) and the main pump upgraded to a Grundfos UPS2 25-80 pump. I control the hot water, central heating, and UFH through the Heatmiser app. The hot water, CH and UFH each have their own zone valve. I have attached a photo (UFH manifold) of my UFH manifold taken last October and a photo ('Zone valves labelled') of my airing cupboard where the megaflo, main pump and zone valves are located. Zone valves marked: 1 = HW, 2 = UFH, 3 = CH.

I currently have a Vaillant ecoTEC Plus 438 38kW system boiler which is 13 years old located in the garage. A few years ago, I sused to get an S.53 message displayed on the boiler. To eliminate this display message, I had to turn down the power of the boiler to 24kW (d0 = 24) so I have been running the heating & HW system with boiler capped at 24kW.

The problem I am having is that when I only have the UFH turned on, the boiler is continously/short cycling. When I turn on the central heating, the issue goes away. In discussion with the Vaillant technical team, their view is the reason why my boiler is cycling is because the flow rate through the boiler & system is not enough when only the UFH is operating. In other words, they are saying the boiler continues to cycle because the boiler is not able to modulate down far enough. For a 24kW boiler, the Vaillant technical person said the min flow rate needs to be 17.2L/min, and for a 30kW boiler, the flow rate needs to be minimum 21.5L/min. I have no idea to know what the flow rate is for my UFH.

There is mention from a couple of heating engineers about introducing a Low Loss Header.

Recently, my boiler is making the 'kettling' sound so I am happy to change the boiler but I also want to eliminate this short cycling boiler issue when I only have the UFH turned on.

Can anyone advise here?
 

Attachments

  • UFH manifold.jpg
    UFH manifold.jpg
    636.9 KB · Views: 121
  • Zone valves labelled.jpg
    Zone valves labelled.jpg
    443 KB · Views: 70
A low-loss header (LLH) is the solution if the root cause is low flow rate through the UFH. If this is the cause the UFH won't be putting out enough heat to maintain the room temperature and this will get progressively more noticeable as the weather gets colder.

A LLH may or may not help if the root cause is low demand for heat from the UFH, i.e. it's below the boiler minimum because the weather is relatively warm or the house insulation is good. In this case, the cycling will get less frequent as the weather gets colder and the UFH will work as designed.

In the second case, the LLH will help to some extent by increasing the effective volume of water in the boiler-UFH loop, which will lengthen the cycling period. If the boiler's "anti-short cycle lock-out" state is being triggered an LLH may be enough to fix it. If not, the dead-cert cure in this case is to add a 'buffer store' to the heating circuit. People don't often do this because (a) cost, (b) space, and (c) modern boilers are designed to cycle (the amount of fuel it wastes is a tiny fraction of the annual total) when heat demand is low, and (d) it only happens in the autumn and spring when you barely need the heating on anyway.

Changing the maximum power setting on the boiler won't affect this aspect of the behaviour, which is related to the minimum power the boiler can deliver while running continuously. (This is governed by the burner design.) If you do change the boiler go for one, e.g. Vessmann, with a low minimum power.
 
Last edited:
Chuck said:
A low-loss header (LLH) is the solution if the root cause is low flow rate through the UFH. If this is the cause the UFH won't be putting out enough heat to maintain the room temperature and this will get progressively more noticeable as the weather gets colder.

A LLH may or may not help if the root cause is low demand for heat from the UFH, i.e. it's below the boiler minimum because the weather is relatively warm or the house insulation is good. In this case, the cycling will get less frequent as the weather gets colder and the UFH will work as designed.

In the second case, the LLH will help to some extent by increasing the effective volume of water in the boiler-UFH loop, which will lengthen the cycling period. If the boiler's "anti-short cycle lock-out" state is being triggered an LLH may be enough to fix it. If not, the dead-cert cure in this case is to add a 'buffer store' to the heating circuit. People don't often do this because (a) cost, (b) space, and (c) modern boilers are designed to cycle (the amount of fuel it wastes is a tiny fraction of the annual total) when heat demand is low, and (d) it only happens in the autumn and spring when you barely need the heating on anyway.

Changing the maximum power setting on the boiler won't affect this aspect of the behaviour, which is related to the minimum power the boiler can deliver while running continuously. (This is governed by the burner design.) If you do change the boiler go for one, e.g. Vessmann, with a low minimum power.
Click to expand...

Chuck said:
A low-loss header (LLH) is the solution if the root cause is low flow rate through the UFH. If this is the cause the UFH won't be putting out enough heat to maintain the room temperature and this will get progressively more noticeable as the weather gets colder.

A LLH may or may not help if the root cause is low demand for heat from the UFH, i.e. it's below the boiler minimum because the weather is relatively warm or the house insulation is good. In this case, the cycling will get less frequent as the weather gets colder and the UFH will work as designed.

In the second case, the LLH will help to some extent by increasing the effective volume of water in the boiler-UFH loop, which will lengthen the cycling period. If the boiler's "anti-short cycle lock-out" state is being triggered an LLH may be enough to fix it. If not, the dead-cert cure in this case is to add a 'buffer store' to the heating circuit. People don't often do this because (a) cost, (b) space, and (c) modern boilers are designed to cycle (the amount of fuel it wastes is a tiny fraction of the annual total) when heat demand is low, and (d) it only happens in the autumn and spring when you barely need the heating on anyway.

Changing the maximum power setting on the boiler won't affect this aspect of the behaviour, which is related to the minimum power the boiler can deliver while running continuously. (This is governed by the burner design.) If you do change the boiler go for one, e.g. Vessmann, with a low minimum power.
Click to expand...
thanks @Chuck. As requested by another person, they wanted to see what the flow & return temps were showing on the boiler as well as the flow meters on the UFH manifold. Below are the readings (I also attached a file showing these readings incase the image below did not come through) . As well as taking the flow & return readings from the boiler, I also took readings from the UFH manifold. The blending valve on the UFH is set around 47 degrees.

I took the readings across 5 minute intervals. What I found is that when I had both, CH and UFH turned on, the boiler was happily firing (without any sound of kettling which there was earlier in the week). The flow meters on the UFH was showing 2.5 (range 0-5). When I turned off the UFH, the flow meters on the UFH went to 5 and these flow meters stayed on 5 when I turned on the UFH and turned off the CH.

After about 10 minutes of the UFH only being on, I could see the boiler short cyling (every 2 mins) and the boiler flow temperature would rocket from 45 to 72 degrees.

When I provided this information to the other person, their response was "Simple fix a 2 port buffer of around 25 to 50 L capacity (closer to 50L is better), across the flow and return loop to the boiler or across the flow and return from the UFH, where ever is easiest to install. No need for low loss headers or 4 port buffers and additional pump (s).

Parts list
  • Two Tee pieces,
  • A buffer or volumiser - these are cheap enough, you need to insulate yourself.
  • Two isolation valves"

Would this potential setup work?

1694780904631.png
 
fowlerboi said:
Your UFH loops are running at 5LPM of flow each?
Click to expand...
The flow meters have been tinkered about of late by some heating engineers. You will see from the readings that when both, the CH and UFH are on, the UFH loops are each running at 2.5LPM. When the UFH then runs on its own, the flow bumps up to 5LPM. I do not know why.

Would this possibly make the boiler short cycle when only the UFH is on?
 
I suspect your boiler pump is interfering with the ufh pump hence why your getting more flow as you have a short / low demand system

You need to reset the flow meters back to spec / Heatloss as you could be damaging the floor / having higher return temps should be 7-10 dc difference between flow and return
 
ShaunCorbs said:
I suspect your boiler pump is interfering with the ufh pump hence why your getting more flow as you have a short / low demand system

You need to reset the flow meters back to spec / Heatloss as you could be damaging the floor / having higher return temps should be 7-10 dc difference between flow and return
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, I don’t have any spec as the UFH was installed by the builder’s heating guy and there was no design.

Do I need to turn down the flow meters to 2.5L when I only have the UFH on? Will that reduce the boiler cycling?
 
windsor-tg said:
Unfortunately, I don’t have any spec as the UFH was installed by the builder’s heating guy and there was no design.

Do I need to turn down the flow meters to 2.5L when I only have the UFH on? Will that reduce the boiler cycling?
Click to expand...

Need to get some temp clamps and get the individual flow and return temp differential on each set of white pipes to 5-7 dc on start up before the slab is hot eg when it’s had a day or two to cool

Won’t stop the boiler cycling due to ufh being let’s say 2kw and the min boiler kw to 6 etc
 
I had this same problem after installing my UFH. With radiator circuit on no problem but with ufh only the boiler was short cycling. I opened the manual bypass valve about 1 turn and the problem has gone away.
 
Could you not just fit an auto bypass across flow and return to UFH manifold (or wherever there is most pipework/water available to increase themal mass cycling through boiler)?
This boiler has a very effective one fitted internally which is prob what is contributing to the kettling.
An external bypass at a lower resistance would bring the thermal mass of water in the flow and return pipes into play and automatically compensate for different heating demands?

If its not too difficult you could maybe even consider increasing size of primary pipework?
 
If you’re considering replacing the boiler anyway, I would just do that.
38kW is way too big - get it sized to your actual heat loss and choose one which can modulate down to the size of your underfloor loss and there will be no problems…. if such a beast exists.
 
Kurt Stone said:
I had this same problem after installing my UFH. With radiator circuit on no problem but with ufh only the boiler was short cycling. I opened the manual bypass valve about 1 turn and the problem has gone away.
Click to expand...
@Kurt Stone - thanks. I have an automatic bypass value fitted along with a gate value (photo attached with yellow line showing bypass valve). If I were to close the gate valve and then open it one turn, would that be similar to what you did?
 
Ben-gee said:
If you’re considering replacing the boiler anyway, I would just do that.
38kW is way too big - get it sized to your actual heat loss and choose one which can modulate down to the size of your underfloor loss and there will be no problems…. if such a beast exists.
Click to expand...
Even though I have a 38kW boiler, it has been capped at 24kW as I was getting an S.53 display message on the boiler (flow & return temp differential too large) so reducing the power of the boiler (d.0) to 24kW eliminated the message. A 30kW boiler is what is being suggested but I’m going to find it hard to find a boiler that can modulate down to around 1.5kW when I just have the UFH on.
 
windsor-tg said:
@Kurt Stone - thanks. I have an automatic bypass value fitted along with a gate value (photo attached with yellow line showing bypass valve). If I were to close the gate valve and then open it one turn, would that be similar to what you did?
Click to expand...
Where is the photo of the above?.

Re your tests:
At T+15, with both CH&UFH on, the UFH shows flow/returns of 48C/27C with a combined flowrate of 5LPM, this is a UFH output of 7.33kw, at T+40, UFH only on, UFH flow/returns of 49C/34C, combined flowrate 10LPM = UFH output of 10.5kw, in both cases, dts of 21C & 15C seem way higher than normal of ~ 7C to 10C.
Also, at T+20 & T+25, CH only on, the UFH still shows a combined flow of 10LPM? can you check your labelling again?

The UPS2 8M pump at any "fixed speed" setting will pump at a head of 6M at even the lowest setting., might be able to suggest a more suitable setting even though there is no constant pressure mode on that pump.
THe ABV at any index setting will have a very high flowrate at speeds 2&3 (7M &M) and will cause rapid cycling and might even still pass at speed 1 (6M).

So,
Check the pump setting.
post a photo of the bypass with the manual valve & the ABV and its make and setting.
what is/was the boiler flow target temperature at the above tests?

1694852690385.png
 
Thanks @John.g
I will look to take a fresh set of readings over the weekend in case I made a mistake.
I have attached photos of the ABV. Hopefully this has come through.

Where you say ‘check the pump settings’ - do you mean the main pump or the UFH pump?
The boiler flow temp is set to 65 but I will double check before I take the new set
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0825.jpeg
    IMG_0825.jpeg
    405.3 KB · Views: 72
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    476.6 KB · Views: 55
No, check the main circ pump near the zone valves or just take a photo of the LED display while running, if the manual by pass valve isn't well throttled then the ABV at that setting could well be by passing ~ 8 LPM or more as the minimum fixed speed pump head is 6M.
 
The red pump
 
windsor-tg said:
Even though I have a 38kW boiler, it has been capped at 24kW as I was getting an S.53 display message on the boiler (flow & return temp differential too large) so reducing the power of the boiler (d.0) to 24kW eliminated the message. A 30kW boiler is what is being suggested but I’m going to find it hard to find a boiler that can modulate down to around 1.5kW when I just have the UFH on.
Click to expand...
boilers that can modulate 10:1 , I doubt you need 30 kw.
18kW is probably enough if you just time the hot water to heat at a time you don’t require heating- then that gets you down to 1.8kw for when you only want ufh.
 
@John.g - I just ran a fresh test and the readings are shown below. The boiler temp is set at 65 degrees. When the UFH is off, the flow meters are 0 so I must have taken a wrong reading yesterday. Also, on T+40, the flow temp on UFH was either 40 or 50. I wrote down 50 at the time but I think that was wrong and it should have possibly been 40.

Are the readings still strange? No kettling sound from the boiler when I was running these test readings.

I have attached a photo of the main pump as well as the UFH pump so that you can see what lights are lit up on each of the pumps. I will send a short video on the main pump in a few mins so that you can possibly hear the sound of the pump when it is running with both, CH and UFH on.

Let me know if more tests and/or photos/videos will be helpful.

1694870230878.png
 

Attachments

  • Main pump.jpg
    Main pump.jpg
    470.6 KB · Views: 48
First I would check the setting of the manual by pass valve with the red handwheel, put a mark on the top of the handwheel at "12 oclock", then turn the hand wheel very slowly clockwise and carefully note the portion of a turn or the full turns required to close it fully, (should be ~ 3 to 4 full turns between fully open and fully closed) then return it initially to the same setting, you may find a 1/2 turn or so of play before the valve starts to reopen so allow for this, (of course if the valve has been left fully (unlikely) open then you will get 3 or 4 full turns to close it)
The main pump is running on full speed (3) which is 8M, I would change that immediately to speed 1 which is 6M and still more than adequate IMO, the 8M setting is probably the reason for the UFH flowrates doubling when UFH running alone. To change the speed, just press the setting button briefly a few times to highlight I (solid green), that may still be too powerful at 6M but we'll see.
The manifold pump is running on minimum speed in fixed speed (CC) mode so leave that as is even though constant pressure (CP) mode is recommended for UFH.

THe UFH seems to be emitting a fair amount of heat, at T+15, CH+UFH on, a total flow of 5LPM with flow/return of 44C/28C gives a output of 5.59kw and at T+50, UFH on its own,, a total flow of 10LPM with flow/return of 44C/34C gives a output of 6.98kw.
You might run a few more tests after changing the pump speed and checking the bypass opening. Maybe just run the UFH only for 15/20 minutes or so to speed things up., you can then run on both once you post the UFH findings.

1694875766817.png
 
New posts

Similar plumbing topics

W
Vaillant ecoTec Plus 630 boiler not reaching target temp
well, I really cannot see what extra features...
Replies
10
Views
2K
windsor-tg
W
W
Time to change Boiler?
@ShaunCorbs - the heating engineer who will be...
Replies
6
Views
995
windsor-tg
W
B
Boiler Short Cycling
Finally (I hope) got to the bottom of this...
2 3
Replies
55
Views
5K
bagaceratops
B
MarkWillGreen
Add underfloor to S-plan - S-plan+? closely spaced tees? new boiler?
Anyway, you can always increase the boiler...
Replies
16
Views
2K
John.g
J
S
Ufh mixing valve and boiler flow temperature
Set the ufh mixer to 30-40 / what the design...
Replies
1
Views
2K
ShaunCorbs
ShaunCorbs
Back
Top