15M pump required, one large Vs 2 small in series? | Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board | Page 2 | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss 15M pump required, one large Vs 2 small in series? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at Plumbers Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
And when sizing system boilers, you don't normally just add the HW peak demand to the CH demand. It'll give you an oversized boiler that short cycles most of the time.

yes and no

if there happy with staggering the times then aslong as heatings over the hot water requirement your fine

but if they dont want to stagger the times you need to take the full demand into account
 
if they dont want to stagger the times you need to take the full demand into account
The only time you need full demand is if the house is at -3C and the cylinder is full of cold water. In normal circumstances the house may drop a few degrees overnight and the cylinder may be as low as 40C; so, even first thing in the morning the boiler will not be running flat out. Modern cylinders are so well insulated that they can be heated up at midnight and the water will still be hot enough for a bath in the morning.

Running the system with hot water priority, using a diverter valve not a mid-position, ensures that the cylinder gets heated quickly during the day, so the reduction in room temperature is minimised.

Michael Groves said:
Grundfos Technical support also confirmed building height.
They need that information to estimate the total pipe run to the index rad and thus the resistance of the circuit.
 
Thanks for literature, I had to sit down quietly for a while to understand.
As per literature I've calculated flow resistance of every radiator supplied with 15mm pipe. I then calculated flow resistance of 22mm pipe supplying 15mm pipe, and finally 28mm pipe supplying 22mm pipe. I included every TRV, elbow and tee. I'm sure I missed a few but I can add a little for that. I included cylinder which adds very little and used figure in literature for boiler, again very small.
So to recap I have 5 story house with 22 radiators. My calculation comes at at 4.5M head. This just sounds way too low. What do you think?
There's a lot of 28mm pipe and 22mm pipe which obviously reduces resistance a lot, but still 4.5M sounds very low.
 
...but still 4.5M sounds very low.

It's not possible to tell whether you've done the calculation correctly from your description. But that's a bit higher than I would expect. Are you aware that you don't just add the flow resistances of radiators together to get the total but you have to take into consideration that they are in series with some pipework but are basically fed in parallel by the pump?

The next question is what displacement rate do you require, which is a figure in litres/minute or cubic-metres/hour? You calculate it from the total amount of power you want the circulator to deliver. For the sake of an example, let's assume 40kW. For a 20°C temperature drop that would need a circulation rate of 1.7 cubic-metres per hour.

You then need to look at the pump curve to make sure that the combination of head and displacement rate lie within its operating curves.
 
The next question is what displacement rate do you require, which is a figure in litres/minute or cubic-metres/hour? You calculate it from the total amount of power you want the circulator to deliver. For the sake of an example, let's assume 40kW. For a 20°C temperature drop that would need a circulation rate of 1.7 cubic-metres per hour.

You then need to look at the pump curve to make sure that the combination of head and displacement rate lie within its operating curves.

Yeah managed to calculate that, I’ve not looked at curves yet as still debating head calculation. But I assume Magna3 autoAdapt takes care of a lot of that.

What gets me if a 5 storey house with 22 rads only needs a 15-50, than most average homes are massively over pumped as this is fitted everywhere?
 
Don't forget the flow in your equation. Its flow against head. Its a curve.
 
Some of the Schools I work in only have 4 meter head pumps installed.
There is more to this than I think you realise.
The Magna 3 is way oversized for your needs in my opinion.

My advice would be to ask a Heating Engineer to calculate this for you. You will need to pay for this spec obviously as it takes time, effort, knowledge and skill but it will work out cheaper than buying a commercial pump.
Don't make the mistake of thinking that oversized is best. It does not work like that and you will end up regretting your decision, an oversized pump will cause issues and is a waste of your hard earned cash.

I hope this helps!
 
used figure in literature for boiler, again very small.
Which literature were you looking at? There's nothing about heat exchanger resistance in the 40CDi Regular Installation Manual (I assume you are talking about the open vent version, not the system one). Did you take it from Technical Bulletin 48? If so the resistance of a 40kW CDi hex is about 3.5 metres, which isn't exactly small.

The 30CDi (which should be more than enough, including HW) has a resistance of approx 1.75m at full output.

What temperature differential did you assume when calculating the system resistance?
 
I used the default figure in the sizing resistance in copper tube. It was tiny. 3.5M is much bigger. Yes looking at 40CDi regular, but with Robo kit. I thought 35CDi system was just too tight. In that case I would need 8.3M head.

I think 30kW would be too small, I also have 500L water cylinder with 20kW heat exchanger.
 
I used the default figure in the sizing resistance in copper tube. It was tiny. 3.5M is much bigger. Yes looking at 40CDi regular, but with Robo kit. I thought 35CDi system was just too tight. In that case I would need 8.3M head.

I think 30kW would be too small, I also have 500L water cylinder with 20kW heat exchanger.

500 litres?
Why?
What do you have in the way of Hot water?
 
It's a HMO, 11 tenants.
Currently only 3 showers, but every room has WHB. There is one communal kitchen. I plan to install maybe another 5 private showers in the larger rooms. Ultimately they'll still be 11 tenants max, but you could get a larger simultaneous draw off.
I must admit I've struggled with the capacity for this, how does it sound now with a little more background info?
 
I think it sounds a lot to be honest with you.
I still think you would be wise to get a Heating Engineer to spec this job for you. Boiler size, Pump size and Domestic Hot water storage, any Cold water storage that may be necessary. You would benefit from the design and the advice they will be able to give. It will cost you a few hundred pounds but I think you will save a lot more. Plus you will have the peace of mind that it will be correct, the knowledge that the system is a as efficient as possible and someone to blame if it goes wrong.
 
I used the default figure in the sizing resistance in copper tube. It was tiny. 3.5M is much bigger. Yes looking at 40CDi regular, but with Robo kit. I thought 35CDi system was just too tight. In that case I would need 8.3M head.
By "default figure" do you mean 11 deg C as on page 2 (46 in the formula for flow rate on same page)? If so, that is incorrect for your boiler which is designed for a 20 deg C differential. 46 then becomes 84. If you redo your flow rates and resistance using 84, you will find that the head is about 30% of what you originally calculated. That's because resistance varies with flow rate squared.

What was "tiny"? Don't understand your reference to 3.5M and 8.3M.

You also need to take the 20C differential and lower operating temperatures (needed to ensure condensing) when selecting your rads, as rad output will be reduced.

It would have been helpful if you had mentioned HMO in your opening post.

Have you thought about having two boilers, a 17kW for the heating and a 20kW for the cylinder? A smaller heating boiler will modulate much lower and will be condensing more often - if the system is correctly designed. You could also include weather compensation.

The HW boiler needs to run with a flow temp of 70-75C and a 10 deg differential, otherwise the cylinder will not heat up to 60C quickly enough. This means the boiler will not condense.
 
You make some very valid points, I think I need to wind this back to make sure I'm getting correct results.
Calculating head is complicated, I'm now thinking about a single boiler using W-Plan. If I also have a 400L cylinder the heat exchanger is 17kW. This way I can use a single 18kW boiler to run both.
Worst scenario if the boiler can't cope I could buy a second 18kW boiler further down the road and have a dedicated boiler for each.
I recall being told by Worchester a while back you want your boiler running at 100% for best efficiency?

Thoughts?
 
Think it will be more than 17kw as normal 300l ones have between 20-25kw coils

Also you just got the one cylinder??
 
Seems to be various heat exchangers, Gledhill 300L has 30kW heat exchanger !!!, I'm looking at Grahams Therma.

I'll just go for a single cylinder.
 
W Plan is either heating or hot water; you can't have both at the same time. If it's a HMO, you won't have any control over when anyone wants to wash, bath or shower. So there may be up to eight people showering early in the morning when the heating needs to be on. With W plan hot water takes priority; everyone freezes as the heating is not on. You can time the hot water to recover when heating is not required, i.e. overnight or when most of the inhabitants are at work; but this can't be guaranteed to work all the time.

Have you had the water pressure and flow rate checked to make sure it is sufficient for eight simultaneous showers?

You haven't answered my earlier questions, so here they are again:
  1. Where did you get the idea from that the CDi 40 heat exchanger was low resistance (tiny?)?
  2. Where does the 3.5m head come from?
  3. Where does the 8.3m head come from?
 
Water Pressure is very good in the property, they'll be no problem.
Agreed it's one or the other with W-Plan, it'll take some tweaking to get it right. But remember with HMO, they're not all rushing out the door to get to work, showers are spread throughout the day. For those that wash anyway!
1. I used a default figure from calculating copper pipe resistance for average boiler, this was proven to be inaccurate. My bad.
2. You said from Technical Bulletin 48 it was 3.5M ?
3. I calculated 4.8M using calculations supplied previously. I simply added your 3.5M and got 8.3M
 
Just been reading modern boilers prefer a W or S-Plan where each circuit gets 100% of boiler. Most 300 & 400 cylinders have a reheat time of 38-45 minutes. Therefore giving Hot Water 100% for 45 minutes every few hours should not affect Central heating that much.
I was also reading if you give hot water preference, you can reheat as soon as it drops, so maybe only need 15 minutes whenever someone takes a shower, so central heating should not be affected unless you get several showers in a row on a cold night.
They were also saying you want the biggest heat loss to stop boiler cycling, so again W or S-Plan so boiler always running at max.
 
1. I used a default figure from calculating copper pipe resistance for average boiler, this was proven to be inaccurate. My bad.
2. You said from Technical Bulletin 48 it was 3.5M ?
3. I calculated 4.8M using calculations supplied previously. I simply added your 3.5M and got 8.3M
  1. Modern heat exchangers have very narrow passageways for the water to pass through, so the resistance is very high. Also, the resistance is not fixed, it varies with the flow rate.
  2. The figure of 3.5m only applies when the heat exchanger is running at max output with a flow-return differential of 20C. The same hex running at 20kW, with the same differential, has a resistance of approx 0.8m. This is because the flow rate is halved. See attached chart for the CDi hex.
  3. The resistance of 4.8m assumed a differential of 11C. Resistance is proportional to flow². The flow rate for a 20C drop will be 55% if the flow for a 11C drop (11/20) so the resistance will be 0.55² = 0.30 x 4.8 = 1.45m.
  4. The available head on WB system boilers is 2m, which gives a margin of 0.55 metres.

Groves.png
 
Just been reading modern boilers prefer a W or S-Plan where each circuit gets 100% of boiler. Most 300 & 400 cylinders have a reheat time of 38-45 minutes. Therefore giving Hot Water 100% for 45 minutes every few hours should not affect Central heating that much.
Only W Plan can guarantee HW priority. That's because it uses a diverter valve (similar to Y plan but without a mid-position).

Most cylinder thermostats have a differential of about 10C. If the hot water is stored at 60C and incoming cold is at 20C, the cylinder temperature will drop to 50C when 25% of the hot water has been used. That's equivalent to two ten-minute showers for a 400 litre cylinder.

They were also saying you want the biggest heat loss to stop boiler cycling, so again W or S-Plan so boiler always running at max.
That doesn't make sense. Can you post a link to this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top