Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Proximity of flue

Status
Not open for further replies.
lame plumber said:
only if you own a few acres of woodland, otherwise £160 a load for dried wood
Click to expand...
Plenty of free wood about if you look !
I had an elm tree down last weekend kept our campfire going for 2 days !
National trust woods belong to the people and collecting wood is a human right to stay alive !
 
lame plumber said:
only if you own a few acres of woodland, otherwise £160 a load for dried wood
Click to expand...
Made me laugh as yes that is what most people do and think but there is another way to live just we all think it is pay ?
I see life in another way now and it is about a bit of hard graft and thinking outside the box !
 
basildog said:
Plenty of free wood about if you look !
I had an elm tree down last weekend kept our campfire going for 2 days !
National trust woods belong to the people and collecting wood is a human right to stay alive !
Click to expand...

not if u nick their Xmas trees, they get really upset 🙂
 
Thanks king.

i do find it uncomfortably close. What about that it breaches the rules?
 
H basil.
I'm sure my neighbours, or anyone else, would not like an overbearing extension built next to them anymore than I like it.
It seems like the guidelines can be ignored if it makes the job easier & cheaper.
 
Hmmm,

It upto you argue where the boundary is as it's a shared path. I personally wouldn't be bothered by it as it does look fairly high in your photo. You could request that a plume management kit is fitted, but they look horrible and I would rather plume in my face that looking at a neighbours plume management kit. If it's a worcester bosch the plume could be diverted at 45degrees upwards.

If your really concerned you will have to go to your local authority and argue it, at the risk of upsetting your neighbour. Some things you just have to tolerate unfortunately.
 
Hi Polly,

If you can prove that the Regulations have been breached in anyway, then you have a case and can demand and alteration of the flue.

There must be an Authority / Organisation that can enforce the adherance to the Gas Regulations.
We have one over here and if a complaint is made, regarding a breach of the Gas Regulations, then the Plumber who installed the unit has to fix the problem, at their expense, to comply with the Regulations.

There can be exceptions made in extreme cases, but if the Regulations can be complied with in a installation, then they must be done to the regulations. If they cannot be complied with then you must apply for a dispensation and have it signed off by a Gas Inspector.

Oz-Plumber
 
Thanks oz. I've been on to the gas safe people who confirmed the guidance, but the guy I spoke to didn't know if the shared path had a bearing on the matter. I think I need to get back on to them. My view is that the guidelines are there to consider neighbouring properties, so would affect the neighbours the same way, whoever uses the path.

Cheers
 
Thanks jimbob. Opinions are mixed, it would bother some & not others. I don't think the pic conveys it well.

i don't know if the regs are enforceable regulations or merely guidelines. I understand the flue at a lower level as this is needs an even further distance from the boundary, 2.5, which takes the boundary well into my garden.i'm going to get back onto gas safe.

All of this could have been avoided if the flue had been vented through the roof. The extension was a new build, so I would have thought easy to do.

cheers
 
Hi Polly,
The regulations would be to the property boundary.
If the flue isn't installed as per regulations then it must be altered.

I have doubts on whether a shared pathway would come into the regulations.

Is the shared pathway on the house / building plans or is it just an accepted thing.
In laymans terms - is it common property?
 
APPlumbing said:
I don't see why any of the guys on here should be brought into this petty squabble.
Click to expand...

Maybe not. There's no need to be insulting though. Better to ignore the thread than go down the route other forums are happy to promote.

You want us to get that rap? I don't.
 
Thanks buck. The flue is .32 from the boundary. The path is the boundary, but is not owned by me. The path is my only access to my property, & the flue property has a right of way so that they can access the rear of their property.

the flue is 2.1m high, and is less than 2m from my garden.
Do you know if these rules are strictly enforceable or merely guidelines that can be ignored?

Thanks, appreciate your response
 
Polly said:
Thanks buck. The flue is .32 from the boundary. The path is the boundary, but is not owned by me. The path is my only access to my property, & the flue property has a right of way so that they can access the rear of their property.

the flue is 2.1m high, and is less than 2m from my garden.
Do you know if these rules are strictly enforceable or merely guidelines that can be ignored?

Thanks, appreciate your response
Click to expand...
according to the guide it should be 2.5m but manufacturers normaly state 600mm .so its not so clear cut one rule overrides another so it can get complicated. I cant see a real problem with the install apart from the plume annoying you. if I was you I would aproacvh the neighbour and ask if the would fit a plume kit or plume re direction end - if the boiler is a Worcester this option is built in and the end can be twisted as stated on a previous post to 45 degrees . disputes like this are best sought out if possible with the neighbour before involving building regs . the engineer who fitted the boiler may even come back to redirect flue if approached.hope this helps
 
The house on the other side to me (the other side of the flue house). I am land locked without it, the flue house has a right of way if they need to access the rear of the property.

it does seem to have breached the rules.
 
time to be realistic here peeps. the extention is built, building regs have probably been involved and signed it off. the path is owned by the extention builder and the op has right of access along it. the flue is high enough not to cause a problem, its only steam you can see and only if you stand on a stool in front of it for quite a while can it have a detremental effect. Gas safe arent going to be worried as its safe iaw their regs, if buildings control have passed it they are unlikely to back track. Sometimes you just have to take a big old chill pill and get on with life. I have people park across my driveway, its aggrevating but you can either live with it, pick a fight and win or pick a fight and get a beating, which isnt going to improve your life any further. chances are if you kick off with the neighbours your life isnt going to get any better and it would seem your main bugbear is the fact someone has built an extention, time to look the other way and get on with life, as you wont win this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

We recommend City Plumbing Supplies, BES, and Plumbing Superstore for all plumbing supplies.

Back
Top