Top-up bottle | Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board | Plumbers Forums

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Discuss Top-up bottle in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at Plumbers Forums

Messages
53
Guys,

I am just changing my own heating system to a sealed system (not the hot water, just heating) because I added a circuit and needed to move the pump, now the Vent and F and E tank are on the pumped side of the pump.

Expansion vessel sized and fitted, and open vent sealed off with a bottle air vent, (or will be) but I have 2 questions...

1, can I use the F and E tank as a "top up bottle" instead of using a mains filling loop? Checking my understanding...I think I can, so long as I can fill the system, then seal it, I don't see an issue.

2, If so, can I simply use it manually, with a gate valve or do I need to fit a non-return valve and have automatic top-up, is this the best of both worlds, or does it just mask leaks? I think I can do either.

Two advantages as I see it...

1, minimum pressure, as only enough to fill the system is needed.
2, less work!! never a bad thing!

Thank you.
 
Know you need a proper filling loop and pressure gauge in with a built-in non-return valve the mains water I think your question shows you don’t really know what you’re doing have you thought about safety devices
 
You can do but you need a nrv on the feed pipe also where's your blow off going ?
 
Know you need a proper filling loop and pressure gauge in with a built-in non-return valve the mains water I think your question shows you don’t really know what you’re doing have you thought about safety devices

Yes, there is a 3 bar pressure valve, in the garage where the boiler is, piped to outside, it's connected into the system with no valves along with the expansion vessel. There is a pressure gauge fitted at that point, next to the boiler.

I could connect a mains filling loop in at that point, but diagrams in the boiler MI show sealed systems with a top-up bottle, rather than a "proper mains filing loop", perhaps as I "don't know what I am doing" you could explain that to me....or explain why the boiler manufacturer doesn't know what he is doing???
 
Just wouldn’t risk a pressurised system on an NRV not failing

I have fitted a complete system, with expansion vessel, blow off valve, piped to outside pressure gauge and a connection for the mains cold water filling loop.

My question was simply, can I fill that system from a top-up bottle, rather than the mains?

The boiler MI shows that I can.

The NRV on the F and E tank (top-up bottle) is to seal the system, not as any safety device.
 
You never mentioned that you’d fitted safety devices and stated yourself that you were looking for the easy route and because of the attitude on a forum where experts give their opinion free of charge I’m out!
 
The “” marks you seem to forget you’re on a forum asking what to do which implies that you don’t know? Correct? Anyway bye
 
The “” marks you seem to forget you’re on a forum asking what to do which implies that you don’t know? Correct? Anyway bye

An expert wanting to help may have said "have you thought about safety devices?" Someone with a bit of knowledge trying to big themselves up would have said "have you thought about safety devices, your question shows you don't really know what you are doing". I didn't say I hadn't piped it up in garden hose either! Your attitude stank. I was looking for answers based on experience so I can understand, and not just plumb by numbers. Your answer about needing a filling loop instead of answering my questions shows that is what you do, so I will wait for an expert. Thanks for your input though.
 
Looking at your post in introdutions I can see that you are not the average diyer looking to save money and you are asking the Q to be sure of what you think will work.
Sometimes the odd " or ! can change the dynamics of the conversation so perhaps a cooling off period here would help matters and the thread can continue later?
 
Looking at your post in introdutions I can see that you are not the average diyer looking to save money and you are asking the Q to be sure of what you think will work.
Sometimes the odd " or ! can change the dynamics of the conversation so perhaps a cooling off period here would help matters and the thread can continue later?

Exactly, Shaun's reply was more what I would expect from polite society.
 
You can do but you need a nrv on the feed pipe also where's your blow off going ?

Thanks Shaun,

I have put the expansion vessel, supplied as a kit in the garage, connected directly to the boiler return. It is fitted with a 4-way manifold, into which is connected, the vessel, the boiler return the blow off valve and a connection for cold fill with a ball valve.

The system is not new, so I want to keep pressures as low as possible, but I am getting some pump-over because the vent and F and E tank are now on the positive side of the pump. It's major work to change that because of the pipework layout.

I would think that once the system is full and the top-up bottle disconnected, nrv in action or gate valve closed, or the mains filling loop disconnected, that the system would not know any different.

The gate valve would be just like the combined nrv/ball valve that came with the kit, but just a nrv would give automatic top-up, like a vented system?

Just looking for any reasons why I am wrong.
 
Using the existing F & E tank how would you achieve the initital system pressure?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Edited
Scrap that question , it was open vented so won't have a minimum requirement.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Shaun,

I have put the expansion vessel, supplied as a kit in the garage, connected directly to the boiler return. It is fitted with a 4-way manifold, into which is connected, the vessel, the boiler return the blow off valve and a connection for cold fill with a ball valve.

The system is not new, so I want to keep pressures as low as possible, but I am getting some pump-over because the vent and F and E tank are now on the positive side of the pump. It's major work to change that because of the pipework layout.

I would think that once the system is full and the top-up bottle disconnected, nrv in action or gate valve closed, or the mains filling loop disconnected, that the system would not know any different.

The gate valve would be just like the combined nrv/ball valve that came with the kit, but just a nrv would give automatic top-up, like a vented system?

Just looking for any reasons why I am wrong.

What boiler you got?
 
So that's fine I would install a nrv on the feed and then just install all you safety things minus the filling loop
 
Guys,

I am just changing my own heating system to a sealed system (not the hot water, just heating) because I added a circuit and needed to move the pump, now the Vent and F and E tank are on the pumped side of the pump.

Expansion vessel sized and fitted, and open vent sealed off with a bottle air vent, (or will be) but I have 2 questions...

1, can I use the F and E tank as a "top up bottle" instead of using a mains filling loop? Checking my understanding...I think I can, so long as I can fill the system, then seal it, I don't see an issue.

2, If so, can I simply use it manually, with a gate valve or do I need to fit a non-return valve and have automatic top-up, is this the best of both worlds, or does it just mask leaks? I think I can do either.

Two advantages as I see it...

1, minimum pressure, as only enough to fill the system is needed.
2, less work!! never a bad thing!

Thank you.
I have read your plans very carefully, I would make an initial,observation that 65% of all sealed unvented systems leak and lose pressure so an unconnected Top up bottle could be a pain, and mains water at pressure is very cheap.
Unless you are worried about wras regulation regarding seperation of drinking water etc. I can quote you chapter and verse if you need to know
I am a heating designer so can see where you are coming from.
But why design problems in ?
I also fail to understand the motivation behind your project
So,perhaps you might elabourate (they can’t touch you for elaborating I do it )
Rob Foster
 
So that's fine I would install a nrv on the feed and then just install all you safety things minus the filling loop

Thank you, great to have it confirmed. I add the filling loop later if I want to, or decide to do away with the header tanks to free up loft space. For now the ball valve on the vessel manifold is a nice comvenient drain point .
 
I have read your plans very carefully, I would make an initial,observation that 65% of all sealed unvented systems leak and lose pressure so an unconnected Top up bottle could be a pain, and mains water at pressure is very cheap.
Unless you are worried about wras regulation regarding seperation of drinking water etc. I can quote you chapter and verse if you need to know
I am a heating designer so can see where you are coming from.
But why design problems in ?
I also fail to understand the motivation behind your project
So,perhaps you might elabourate (they can’t touch you for elaborating I do it )
Rob Foster

Thanks Rob,

The house I bought in 1994 was a small cottage, with no heating or hot water. I installed a boiler in the cornerof the 8' x 8' kirchen and, because there was no space I put the cold water tank, f and e tank, hot water cylinder, pump and S plan valves in the loft.
Primary flow went from the boiler, past tje vent pipe, past the fande through the pump and into the S plan valves.
The house is 2.5 times the size now and what was the cornerof the kitchen is the middle of the lounge and the boiler is in the garage, which didn't exist back then.
I have added two radiators in the, now, kitchen, (to replace electric underfloor heating) and connected into the f and r primarys for 2 reasons. First, it saves ripping the house apart and second, so I can have it as a seperate zone. With the pump in the loft, A, the heating or hw would need to be on to get circulation so it could only be a zone that could be off, not on by itself. B, the circulation could/would bypass the boiler. So I moved the pump to the flow directly above the boiler. But that puts the pump before the vent and f and e connections.
Again, moving those involves pipe runs in the decorated part of the house, so I decided to make it a sealed system.

It's almost just an acedemic interest thing for me to know if I can use the f and e tank as a top up bottle, permanemtly connected via a nrv.

I have oversized the expansion vessel slightly to reduce the pressure rise and only filling to atmospheric pressure via the top-up bittle seems a good move too.
 
Using the existing F & E tank how would you achieve the initital system pressure?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Edited
Scrap that question , it was open vented so won't have a minimum requirement.

That is my understanding, also, as the boiler has top outlets, the chance of damaging it, or causing a danger, from running dry is minimal, unless the boiler itself fails, then it's damaged anyway, and that's no different to a vented system.
 

Similar plumbing topics

  • Question
Replies
2
Views
401
If you are paranoid, refill, circulate and...
Replies
2
Views
397
  • Question
I have two rads upstairs connected exactly the...
Replies
22
Views
2K
D
  • Question
I'm plumbing my campervan and made the...
Replies
0
Views
728
Deleted member 129220
D
  • Question
Many thanks for your advice I will get up into...
Replies
3
Views
488
Back
Top