Central heating pump | Central Heating Forum | Page 2 | Plumbers Forums

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Discuss Central heating pump in the Central Heating Forum area at Plumbers Forums

The manifold inlet temperature and mixed inlet temperature should be the same as the boiler temp until the inlet temp reaches the TMV setpoint.
 
That loop is emitting 16.1kw, you would think all right that the dT might be less at 2.0/2.4LPM, also still doesn't explain why it takes so long to get the temp up to 50C, the loop contains ~ 90L and assuming a cold water temp of 20C, would only require only 3.2kwh so should only take ~ 10/15 minutes as the loops are emitting very little until the flow temperature rises up a bit. If both UFH+rads on then will be very slow to heat up with a boiler output capped to 26kw, should be OK once rooms up to temperature.
You said the pump is noisy when you try to reduce the head, have you actually reduced it or is it still at 1.8bar?, if you post the other UFH details like above, loop flows+ manifold flow/return temps we can see the total flowrate required (with rads i/s as well) and see if the old pump was/is still suitable.
 
The other manifold only has 3 loops going, one at 1.5 lpm, small laundry loop, 2 other loops at 2 lpm. Flow 45 return 40, out of the 15 rads we only run 9 as the remaining are in rooms not used. Forgot mention this boiler also has 24m of trench heating it is suppose to run as well, (we only use this occasionally)
 
Ok, thanks, you might just post the two manifold pump modes/settings.

What are your intentions now re above?, do you intend to re install the old pump?.

A lot of experienced installers/posters on here reckon that a low loss header is the way to go with systems like yours. I don't have the experience to comment, have only seen one system with a combined UFH&rad system, my daughters, which has run perfectly for the past 9 years without the LLH, she also has a Firebird 26kw boiler with 10 rads and one ~ 120M2 UFH system, boiler has a ancient 6M grundfos selectric running on speed2 and I think the UFH manifold pump is a grundfos UPS2 (but can't see as it & the manifold are hidden).
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks, you might just post the two manifold pump modes/settings.

What are your intentions now re above?, do you intend to re install the old pump?.

A lot of experienced installers/posters on here reckon that a low loss header is the way to go with systems like yours. I don't have the experience to comment, have only seen one system with a combined UFH&rad system, my daughters, which has run perfectly for the past 9 years without the LLH, she also has a Firebird 26kw boiler with 10 rads and one ~ 120M2 UFH system, boiler has a ancient 6M grundfos selectric running on speed2 and I think the UFH manifold pump is a grundfos UPS2 (but can't see as it & the manifold are hidden).
I believe the pump never needed replaced, the person who installed it use to come out and turn the pump pressure up one week and then the next week he would come and turn it down. This went on for weeks, he turn the pressure up and turned it down. 😂 this afternoon the other manifold had a flow at the boiler of 60 and a return of 59 🤷🏼‍♀️🤷🏼‍♀️ After travelling 110m!! Would the trouble manifold need a bypass on it?
 
I believe the pump never needed replaced, the person who installed it use to come out and turn the pump pressure up one week and then the next week he would come and turn it down. This went on for weeks, he turn the pressure up and turned it down. 😂 this afternoon the other manifold had a flow at the boiler of 60 and a return of 59 🤷🏼‍♀️🤷🏼‍♀️ After travelling 110m!! Would the trouble manifold need a bypass on it?
 

Attachments

  • 974AA78A-F676-466B-A967-831E482B3858.jpeg
    974AA78A-F676-466B-A967-831E482B3858.jpeg
    615.6 KB · Views: 31
  • CB706CC2-E517-4FF5-BF89-9DA843C6514A.jpeg
    CB706CC2-E517-4FF5-BF89-9DA843C6514A.jpeg
    415.6 KB · Views: 32
  • C34067B5-81C2-4B18-B697-38D349F48484.jpeg
    C34067B5-81C2-4B18-B697-38D349F48484.jpeg
    470.2 KB · Views: 30
  • C1731BB9-C4B8-40FF-A3E0-B79B0D588DC9.jpeg
    C1731BB9-C4B8-40FF-A3E0-B79B0D588DC9.jpeg
    391.7 KB · Views: 29
  • 35E92401-DA14-4873-81BD-D849025BA703.jpeg
    35E92401-DA14-4873-81BD-D849025BA703.jpeg
    380.6 KB · Views: 32
Not sure if I am with you, UFH is generally run at temperatures < 50C, say in the 35C to 45C range, so if the TMV is set to 45C and the boiler stat to 70C, then, initially, all the flow through the manifold will be from the boiler with no recirc, once the boiler temperature & TMV are > 45C then the TMV will start recirculating some of the cooler return manifold water to mix with the incoming, eventually, 70C boiler water to maintain that 45C, IMO, even from cold, the troubled UFH, on its own, should reach that 45C in < 15 minutes at the very most. So question remains, is the temperature taking ages to rise even to this 45C or whatever, there is no reason whatsoever IMO as to why it shouldn't. That is why I'm asking to note (again) from cold that UFH manifold (total) flow rate and manifold temperature rise up to say 45C or whatever the TMV is set to. The troubled UFH TMV is set to index 4.8 (48C??), can't see the other one. If the TMV is faulty and on full recirc then the temperature will never rise but the boiler flow temp will and should rise in a few minutes to its setpoint and the burner should cut out.

What are the two pipe stats controlling?, one seems to be set to 60C. They may be wired as safety stats to stop the manifold pump if the manifold temperature rises too high? or maybe shut the zone valve which then tells the manifold pump to stop.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if I am with you, UFH is generally run at temperatures < 50C, say in the 35C to 45C range, so if the TMV is set to 45C and the boiler stat to 70C, then, initially, all the flow through the manifold will be from the boiler with no recirc, once the boiler temperature & TMV are > 45C then the TMV will start recirculating some of the cooler return manifold water to mix with the incoming, eventually, 70C boiler water to maintain that 45C, IMO, even from cold, the troubled UFH, on its own, should reach that 45C in < 15 minutes at the very most. So question remains, is the temperature taking ages to rise even to this 45C or whatever, there is no reason whatsoever IMO as to why it shouldn't. That is why I'm asking to note (again) from cold that UFH manifold (total) flow rate and manifold temperature rise up to say 45C or whatever the TMV is set to. The troubled UFH TMV is set to index 4.8 (48C??), can't see the other one. If the TMV is faulty and on full recirc then the temperature will never rise but the boiler flow temp will and should rise in a few minutes to its setpoint and the burner should cut out.

What are the two pipe stats controlling?, one seems to be set to 60C. They may be wired as safety stats to stop the manifold pump if the manifold temperature rises too high? or maybe shut the zone valve which then tells the manifold pump to stop.
Our boiler star has been tuned down to 60 degrees by the tradesman to try and stop the boiler from overheating, and he turned TMV up to 48. I keep asking if there is to be a delta t to around 20 at the boiler for it to condensate it’s not going to work as we have already stated with a boiler temp of 60. They turn the TMV up because they want a higher return to make the boiler condensate. The two pipe stats are wired to the pump to stop it incase of high temperatures.

I will let the boiler cool right down and note the times and flow rates. Thank you for all your help.
 
I can assure you Sheryl that there is absolutely no fear of the boiler overheating even if you run with its max allowable flow temp of 75C or 80C.
Actually the biggest problem with running UFH only is that the boiler return is too LOW, great for condensing effect but bad from a corrosion point of view especially with a OF boiler due to sulphur in the kerosene, problem with a gas fired boiler is that the dT between the boiler flow and return can exceed 30C which is a trip on lots of them. This is one reason for installing a LLH.
On UFH only the UFH return temp IS the boiler return temp.

Example. Boiler flow temp 70C. UFH demand 16kw, UFH flow temp 45C, UFH return temp 35C. The boiler flow (and return) 6.55LPM, 6.55LPM of water at 70C will be mixed with 16.33LPM of recirculated water at 35C to give the required 22.93LPM flow at 45C through the UFH loops.
I will do another calc with radiators i/s as well as UFH.
Schematic may be worth a lot of talking.

1656681768600.png
 
Last edited:
Boiler Flow temp of 60C. Rad output 10kw combined with ufh of 16kw gives a almost perfect boiler return temp of 42.4C which is high enough to prevent corrosion but low enough to give meaningful condensing.

1656682737128.png
 
Last edited:
Boiler Flow temp of 70C. Rad output 10kw combined with ufh of 16kw gives a boiler return of almost 50C.

View attachment 76278
Hi John, interesting reading and out biggest problem is our troubled manifold is running 70% of the time by itself, where are rads are positioned they receive a lot of solar gain. Our troubled manifold is on a thermostat with a 3 degrees difference to turn back in. The biggest problem is thermostat gets up to temp but with 2 hours the sensor has detected the 3. Degrees drop and turns back on. Where does a LLH go on the system, maybe this is our only option. You are very helpful, thank you.
 
So a ~ 4 hour cycle, 2 hrs on, 2hrs off. I don't see why this should cause any problem in getting the UFH loop temperatures up to set point very rapidly, does it shut a zone valve and the manifold pump?. (No room stat with this?)
 
So a ~ 4 hour cycle, 2 hrs on, 2hrs off. I don't see why this should cause any problem in getting the UFH loop temperatures up to set point very rapidly, does it shut a zone valve and the manifold pump?. (No room stat with this?)
The zone valve, pump and boiler all shut down when thermostat reaches temp and tells everything to turn off. I have attached a graph of the flow and return at the boiler, interesting when the boiler is firing temp low, then boiler turns off and pump pumping only temp rises
 

Attachments

  • A24709BA-155A-4AE9-8E24-C4C39BD115AF.png
    A24709BA-155A-4AE9-8E24-C4C39BD115AF.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 34
  • CB546CD4-2818-4431-BD17-FAF10257B313.png
    CB546CD4-2818-4431-BD17-FAF10257B313.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 28
Very interesting, you can see that the boiler return stays very constant at 39C once system up to temperature which is correct as this is the UFH loop return. What would be nice to see is the UFH manifold (mixed) flow temperature during the same period, if you can only monitor two then run the boiler with the boiler flow temp and the manifold mixed temperature. The boiler flow&return were ~ 24C on start up, after 5 mins 40C/27.4C and 70C/39C at burner off after 32 minutes. When circuits up to temperature, then burner cycle time was ~ 12 mins, 6 on, 6 off, so around 13kw average boiler output?.

There are two different requirements here.
one: when on this UFH only, boiler circ pump should stay running continuously with ufh demand and boiler burner cycling on/off.
two: when no demand from UFH, boiler circ pump should also shut down as well as the zone valve and manifold pump, presume this is what is happening?

Once all tests carried out you may consider reducing the manifold temperature from 48C to say 40C which will give longer run times without the (safety) floor sensor acting, even though 2 hours is a reasonable run time. Once steady demand conditions are established (not bad, just now) then the burner on time as a % of the cycle (on/off) times should accurately reflect the UFH & boiler demand. If the burner run time is say 62% of the cycle time then the boiler output is 26*62%, 16kw.
 
Now that I'm fully awake and looking at the trends below, it would seem that the red might be the burner off times and the blue the burner on times, the burner seems to cut out at ~ 72C/75C and cut in at 61C/63C. One way or the other anyway the boiler is maintaining its stat settings so don,t see any big overall problem as long as the UFH flow/return temps are constant and the calculation (LPMx60*dT/860) corresponds to the boiler % cycling time.
 

Attachments

  • Central Heating Pump Firing 2.png
    Central Heating Pump Firing 2.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 29
Very interesting, you can see that the boiler return stays very constant at 39C once system up to temperature which is correct as this is the UFH loop return. What would be nice to see is the UFH manifold (mixed) flow temperature during the same period, if you can only monitor two then run the boiler with the boiler flow temp and the manifold mixed temperature. The boiler flow&return were ~ 24C on start up, after 5 mins 40C/27.4C and 70C/39C at burner off after 32 minutes. When circuits up to temperature, then burner cycle time was ~ 12 mins, 6 on, 6 off, so around 13kw average boiler output?.

There are two different requirements here.
one: when on this UFH only, boiler circ pump should stay running continuously with ufh demand and boiler burner cycling on/off.
two: when no demand from UFH, boiler circ pump should also shut down as well as the zone valve and manifold pump, presume this is what is happening?

Once all tests carried out you may consider reducing the manifold temperature from 48C to say 40C which will give longer run times without the (safety) floor sensor acting, even though 2 hours is a reasonable run time. Once steady demand conditions are established (not bad, just now) then the burner on time as a % of the cycle (on/off) times should accurately reflect the UFH & boiler demand. If the burner run time is say 62% of the cycle time then the boiler output is 26*62%, 16kw.
Yes when room stat is up to temp it shuts everything down.
Here is another boiler graph after they downsized the boiler to 26kw

Also this afternoon I watched the boiler start up from cold, 4.02pm start up 32deg, 4.15pm 45 deg, 4.22pm 49deg, pump set to 1.45 bar, 1840rpm, return flow 43.1deg and that’s where it sat for 1 hour
C36B847A-4596-4925-A18E-0078D0F032C8.jpeg
A668B7D6-AC23-4E5F-B8E2-0CB59219DA64.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • AA9E79DE-16F1-4E06-A146-D8039EEEA751.jpeg
    AA9E79DE-16F1-4E06-A146-D8039EEEA751.jpeg
    359.5 KB · Views: 23
  • B637FE3A-D13C-42C1-8979-6638A2333CB7.jpeg
    B637FE3A-D13C-42C1-8979-6638A2333CB7.jpeg
    382.1 KB · Views: 26
  • BA1A7366-1986-4534-BB9F-34DE41367246.jpeg
    BA1A7366-1986-4534-BB9F-34DE41367246.jpeg
    407 KB · Views: 27
  • B2A8B070-4367-4ED5-BD5C-CBE285D0446B.jpeg
    B2A8B070-4367-4ED5-BD5C-CBE285D0446B.jpeg
    363.5 KB · Views: 29
Now that I'm fully awake and looking at the trends below, it would seem that the red might be the burner off times and the blue the burner on times, the burner seems to cut out at ~ 72C/75C and cut in at 61C/63C. One way or the other anyway the boiler is maintaining its stat settings so don,t see any big overall problem as long as the UFH flow/return temps are constant and the calculation (LPMx60*dT/860) corresponds to the boiler % cycling time.
 
Now that I'm fully awake and looking at the trends below, it would seem that the red might be the burner off times and the blue the burner on times, the burner seems to cut out at ~ 72C/75C and cut in at 61C/63C. One way or the other anyway the boiler is maintaining its stat settings so don,t see any big overall problem as long as the UFH flow/return temps are constant and the calculation (LPMx60*dT/860) corresponds to the boiler % cycling time.
No red is the burner firing, blue is the boiler pump circulating only
 
The zone valve, pump and boiler all shut down when thermostat reaches temp and tells everything to turn off. I have attached a graph of the flow and return at the boiler, interesting when the boiler is firing
No red is the burner firing, blue is the boiler pump circulating only

temp low, then boiler turns off and pump pumping only temp rises
Yes that’s correct. That’s what I couldn’t understand when carrying out the experiment, why would the temp rise when pump only pumping as opposed to boiler firing and the temp is low
 
OK, confusing signals allright, what UFH output are you getting by doing the calc, above, and what is the time scale on the trends bottom. the boiler would appear to be firing ~ 86.6% of the time, ~ 8.35M on & 1.29M off, this gives a average output of 22.5kw based on a 26kw boiler, how does this compare with the calculated numbers?.
Edit: These tests were carried out last november and the return temp was 50C which means a manifold flow temp of ~ 60C.

Sometime, you might carry out those tests on the healthy system,.
 

Attachments

  • Central Heating Pump Firing 3.jpg
    Central Heating Pump Firing 3.jpg
    689.2 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
OK, confusing signals allright, what UFH output are you getting by doing the calc, above, and what is the time scale on the trends bottom. the boiler would appear to be firing ~ 86.6% of the time, ~ 8.35M on & 1.29M off, this gives a average output of 22.5kw based on a 26kw boiler, how does this compare with the calculated numbers?.
Edit: These tests were carried out last november and the return temp was 50C which means a manifold flow temp of ~ 60C.

Sometime, you might carry out those tests on the healthy system,.
Here is a graph of the radiators calling for heat, BLUE IS BOILER FIRING, Red is pump only circulating
23735197-A1B5-4ED0-AE78-C69D3CC165CB.jpeg
 

Similar plumbing topics

Each manifold will have it's own pump and TMV...
Replies
7
Views
1K
https://www.plumbersforums.net/threads/problems...
Replies
6
Views
2K
S
Sketch/ pictures of your existing pipework...
Replies
3
Views
948
Sometimes the connection point of the cylinder...
Replies
3
Views
630
P
Hi, I have a new built house with the...
Replies
0
Views
969
PierpaoloB
P
Back
Top