Twin head pump or Y plan? | Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board | Plumbers Forums
  • Welcome to PlumbersTalk.net

    Welcome to Plumbers' Talk | The new domain for UKPF / Plumbers Forums. Login with your existing details they should all work fine. Please checkout the PT Updates Forum

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

American Visitor?

Hey friend, we're detecting that you're an American visitor and want to thank you for coming to PlumbersTalk.net - Here is a link to the American Plumbing Forum. Though if you post in any other forum from your computer / phone it'll be marked with a little american flag so that other users can help from your neck of the woods. We hope this helps. And thanks once again.

Discuss Twin head pump or Y plan? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at Plumbers Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bunker

Im quoting to replace a boiler (oil) and its currently got a twin head pump arrangement which seems to work ok. Shall I leave as is, or should I replace with Y plan (or even S plan I guess..).
 
Why is S plan the favourite? Also, I know you have to put a bypass on, but on Y plan you dont need one (although its still required) because you cannot close a 3 way valve..
 
ive always found 2 port valves more reliable than 3 ports
 
What happened to momo's hardley see them anymore allways spring return, im amazed boiler style diverter valves and motor heads have not come across in to seperate component systems like s and y plan.
 
ive always found 2 port valves more reliable than 3 ports

Just ran some stats, with interesting results.

Looking at our return-in-warranty stats, there is a clear difference in Honeywell valves between the 2 port and the 3 port.

The return rate on 2 port is 0.3%, or three in a thousand. The return rate for 3 port is 1.3%, or thirteen per thousand, or 4 times more failures - admittedly still a very small number.

With Drayton, both 2 port and 3 port have exactly the same failure rate - 0.8% or eight per thousand.

So the moral of the story is - if you are fitting 2 port valves, buy Honeywell, but for 3 port valves, go Drayton.
 
Ray, is that return rate just the warranty period of the valve? If so what is the warranty length?
 
Ray, is that return rate just the warranty period of the valve? If so what is the warranty length?

Yes, its just the "in-warranty" which I believe is a year on both plus 6 months shelf life time (until we introduced our minimum 2 yr warranty but that was too recent to affect this).

In that respect it doesn't help to tell you if one manufacturer has a 5 year mean time before failure and the other has 25 years.
 
Yes, its just the "in-warranty" which I believe is a year on both plus 6 months shelf life time (until we introduced our minimum 2 yr warranty but that was too recent to affect this).

In that respect it doesn't help to tell you if one manufacturer has a 5 year mean time before failure and the other has 25 years.
Do you have any mean time before failure info for honeywell/ drayton valves or other brand stuff?
 
Do you have any mean time before failure info for honeywell/ drayton valves or other brand stuff?

Nope. The manufacturers would have it, but they would probably tell you their account details and PIN number before they would release that data.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar plumbing topics

thanks.... yes, so my diagram and wording is...
2 3
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Question
Its a very ingenious but devilishly cunning...
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
Just done a Pure combi today, and it is a UPM3...
Replies
14
Views
333
Anyway, you can always increase the boiler...
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top