- Messages
- 10,026
Unless you had done work that was clearly very serious and showed you as incompetent, then the customer should have called you back to the job, not a builder.
Although possible, rarely would a waste pipe disconnected do instant heavy damage, so it all seems suspicious.
That fact the customer had you doing work in the past is useful information to a court as it shows she had no concerns about your work as she has now got you back.
The Small Claims Court prefers hard evidence, so all communication between you and customer plus from the builder, insurance company (if any), will be needed. Letters, emailed letters, texts, photographs, are all evidence.
So just send an invoice and include a letter stating you were never informed of any problem to rectify and can now not verify where a leak has happened, or who was responsible for the existing plumbing work. Keep copies of any letters.
Although possible, rarely would a waste pipe disconnected do instant heavy damage, so it all seems suspicious.
That fact the customer had you doing work in the past is useful information to a court as it shows she had no concerns about your work as she has now got you back.
The Small Claims Court prefers hard evidence, so all communication between you and customer plus from the builder, insurance company (if any), will be needed. Letters, emailed letters, texts, photographs, are all evidence.
So just send an invoice and include a letter stating you were never informed of any problem to rectify and can now not verify where a leak has happened, or who was responsible for the existing plumbing work. Keep copies of any letters.