Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Thread starter Dan
- Start date
- Replies 202
- Views 78K
-
- Tags
- fitting gas engineer
Discuss DIY Gas Fitting in the General DIY Plumbing Forum area at Plumbers Forums
B
Bernie2
That is true mountainman. If you get paid for gas work you have to be registered. The operative word is paid. CORGI and Gas Safe both usually inspect your work after registration. Why would they do that if quality of work was not an issue?
If registration and qualification alone where the answer to anything would we have so many car accidents? The reason Gas Safe inspectors are probably
not all over the place inspecting work quality is cost not perhaps because they would not like to be.
Competence is a mute point, I have never asked a doctor if they are competent or asked to see their registration I just assume they are competent because they have set themselves up as a doctor.
I think in English law you have duty of care to be able to do what you say you can.
So if you work on gas you must be able to do so to meet the requirements of The Gas Regs. The blame is on you if you can't whether registered or not. It would be no use claiming "I am qualified as a defence in the case of an accident!" The accident would probably serve as proof you weren't. So quality of work is a big issue.
A bit like a well qualified baker saying "I bake lovely cakes!" How do you know unless you eat one?
That is what companies want "Good work and few if any come backs" Having practical skill knowledge in our heads is not much use to a customer if we can't turn it into real quality work.
If registration and qualification alone where the answer to anything would we have so many car accidents? The reason Gas Safe inspectors are probably
not all over the place inspecting work quality is cost not perhaps because they would not like to be.
Competence is a mute point, I have never asked a doctor if they are competent or asked to see their registration I just assume they are competent because they have set themselves up as a doctor.
I think in English law you have duty of care to be able to do what you say you can.
So if you work on gas you must be able to do so to meet the requirements of The Gas Regs. The blame is on you if you can't whether registered or not. It would be no use claiming "I am qualified as a defence in the case of an accident!" The accident would probably serve as proof you weren't. So quality of work is a big issue.
A bit like a well qualified baker saying "I bake lovely cakes!" How do you know unless you eat one?
That is what companies want "Good work and few if any come backs" Having practical skill knowledge in our heads is not much use to a customer if we can't turn it into real quality work.
F
fuzzy
Correct!
End of discussion IMO.
yes it is correct for people 'working' on gas making money. If your doing it for yourself you do not have to be registered, only competent
F
fuzzy
You are only deemed 'competent' if you have passed ACS and are registered with Gas Safe
why can you not be competent, passed your ACS and not registered? nothing wrong with doing that and working on your own gas
F
fuzzy
To just sum up basically, if u do DIY gas installations, you are a clown! End of
if your competent and do your own DIY installation whats the problem? registered or not, your not breaking any rules are you are working as safe as somebody who is registered
F
fuzzy
Who worked on the installation previously is irrelevant.
It is currently the law that anyone who works on gas systems must be GSR. experience and competence are a bonus.
wrong, you dont have to be GSR to work on gas
B
Bernie2
Yes fuzzy is right.
Lets be honest, there is nothing stopping people working on gas in their own homes now. Would it not be better if they are proven competent on a short course to recognise that?
I feel sure many ex or unemployed gas fitters would welcome that.
It would not be a case of allowing them to work for money in the full open market place, just their own home and possibly in a relations home for no money, if found to be competent?
It cuts out risk doesn't it, while it does not threaten the livelihoods of others who want to work for money to any great extent?
The idea that all of a sudden thousands of ex-gas fitters willing to work for nothing taking all the work from those that do, would appear seems silly.
And anyway they could not do that as the licence would restrict them to work on only one or two houses as named and stated on the licence. I cannot imagine that being seen as a commercial threat to anybody. It would also perhaps help clear up a grey area.
You have to go careful about what salesmen say about being GSR to promote training courses and the extent it applies.
And I do not promote none GSR working and would recommend everybody be GSR registered if they can afford it. The thing is the costs are so prohibitive that a none working individual would struggle to get back the cost layout.
That is not fair to individuals with few resources, for what is supposedly an imposed safety requirement. Lets not forget ACS are not training they are safety inspections.
Any cost regarding safety should be easily recoverable by everybody possibly by tax breaks or grants.
The likes of BS should only cost a couple of quid for a standard not the high cost they are.
Lets be honest if I said to you "You have got to work safely, but I will charge you thousands of pounds to tell you how!" you would think I was more concerned with my wallet than safety wouldn't you?
We are supposed to be keeping people safe not making a small fortune out of safety.
Lets be honest, there is nothing stopping people working on gas in their own homes now. Would it not be better if they are proven competent on a short course to recognise that?
I feel sure many ex or unemployed gas fitters would welcome that.
It would not be a case of allowing them to work for money in the full open market place, just their own home and possibly in a relations home for no money, if found to be competent?
It cuts out risk doesn't it, while it does not threaten the livelihoods of others who want to work for money to any great extent?
The idea that all of a sudden thousands of ex-gas fitters willing to work for nothing taking all the work from those that do, would appear seems silly.
And anyway they could not do that as the licence would restrict them to work on only one or two houses as named and stated on the licence. I cannot imagine that being seen as a commercial threat to anybody. It would also perhaps help clear up a grey area.
You have to go careful about what salesmen say about being GSR to promote training courses and the extent it applies.
And I do not promote none GSR working and would recommend everybody be GSR registered if they can afford it. The thing is the costs are so prohibitive that a none working individual would struggle to get back the cost layout.
That is not fair to individuals with few resources, for what is supposedly an imposed safety requirement. Lets not forget ACS are not training they are safety inspections.
Any cost regarding safety should be easily recoverable by everybody possibly by tax breaks or grants.
The likes of BS should only cost a couple of quid for a standard not the high cost they are.
Lets be honest if I said to you "You have got to work safely, but I will charge you thousands of pounds to tell you how!" you would think I was more concerned with my wallet than safety wouldn't you?
We are supposed to be keeping people safe not making a small fortune out of safety.
Last edited by a moderator:
F
fuzzy
Don't know if this link works but have a look if it does.
[DLMURL="http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2012/coi-e-65.htm"]Plumber jailed for carrying out illegal gas work[/DLMURL]
Ps, who's making a small fortune???
yes it is thanks, it backs up what i have been saying, to work as a gas fitter on numerous houses and claim to be registered you are working illegaly. This does not prove in any way that it is illegal to work on your own home if competent to do so
Last edited by a moderator:
M
mountainman
Did you read this bit though?
HSE Inspector Edward Crick said:
"It is against the law for anyone who is not registered with Gas Safe to carry out work on a gas appliance. When unqualified workers try to bypass the law in this way they are not only putting themselves at risk of prosecution, and potentially a large fine or a spell in prison - they are also putting their customers' lives at risk.
The inspector doesn't say anything about competence or working in your own home or for friends & family being acceptable does he.
The first three lines of his statement say it all!
HSE Inspector Edward Crick said:
"It is against the law for anyone who is not registered with Gas Safe to carry out work on a gas appliance. When unqualified workers try to bypass the law in this way they are not only putting themselves at risk of prosecution, and potentially a large fine or a spell in prison - they are also putting their customers' lives at risk.
The inspector doesn't say anything about competence or working in your own home or for friends & family being acceptable does he.
The first three lines of his statement say it all!
F
fuzzy
Did you read this bit though?
HSE Inspector Edward Crick said:
"It is against the law for anyone who is not registered with Gas Safe to carry out work on a gas appliance. When unqualified workers try to bypass the law in this way they are not only putting themselves at risk of prosecution, and potentially a large fine or a spell in prison - they are also putting their customers' lives at risk.
The inspector doesn't say anything about competence or working in your own home or for friends & family being acceptable does he.
The first three lines of his statement say it all!
yep, and it further strengthens what ive been saying, when working for 'customers' you must be registered, in this context i totally agree. this is different than working in your own home, the regs state quite clearly you must be competent, doesnt mention registration
M
mountainman
But you have ignored the first three lines of his statement which clearly state that it is against the law for a non GSR individual to work on a gas appliance.
Twenty two litte words sums up the legal viewpoint and one on which a court of law would base their case; regardless of the competency or experience of the defendant.
Twenty two litte words sums up the legal viewpoint and one on which a court of law would base their case; regardless of the competency or experience of the defendant.
F
fuzzy
But you have ignored the first three lines of his statement which clearly state that it is against the law for a non GSR individual to work on a gas appliance.
Twenty two litte words sums up the legal viewpoint and one on which a court of law would base their case; regardless of the competency or experience of the defendant.
in this context he is right, but it doesnt affect working on your own property, this article didnt talk about somebody working on their own property. it delt with somebody earning a living from gas work without being registered, therefore in that context all that is written is correct
do you have any links to somebody being done for installing something properly in their own home when competent but not being registered?
F
fuzzy
i dont need to , they have posted the information in the regulations, its there for all to see and ive quoted here in the past.
I dont have any links to the contrary, but then again who would report the fact that somebody carried something out legally and didnt go to court?
I dont have any links to the contrary, but then again who would report the fact that somebody carried something out legally and didnt go to court?
F
fuzzy
not quite sure what you refer to when you say you win, in fact im not quite sure you understand the regulations. it states quite cleary you only have to be competent to work on gas, you only have to be regsitered if you work and charge for it ie emplyed or self employed. it really is that simple, its there in black and white
its up to you to prove you are competenet, it doesnt state what that refers to, it is widely accepted that to be competent you must have your acs, i agree, but i also feel there are exceptions to this, is my retired friend who was a tutor at british gas and helped set up the acs when it first started
its up to you to prove you are competenet, it doesnt state what that refers to, it is widely accepted that to be competent you must have your acs, i agree, but i also feel there are exceptions to this, is my retired friend who was a tutor at british gas and helped set up the acs when it first started
L
lambchop
The reason why the d.i.y. stores are allowed to sell gas parts etc, enabling the d.i.y. er to put everybody at risk is because they went to court and argued the point that it is restrictive under the freedom of trade act to stop them from doing so! It goes to show how many people are doing there own work because they are selling lots of stuff at silly prices that no tradesman would pay unless a dire emergency on a sun aft. Spoke to a gas safe inspector about this and they said we have tried to stop this a number of times but they have chucked the towel in. Should invalidate house insurance if you dont have your gas apps serviced annually = good all round for everybody
B
Bernie2
Hmm!
Would not mind it being part of an insurance policy to get gas installations tested.
But would limit the cost a gas fitter could charge to about £5 to the customer and the rest paid by the insurance company. It may be amazing how many customers you would get if costs are low, even the DIY would find it cheaper to get you in.
Funny really how Safety and cost get all mixed up. Seems to me, a lot of money can be made out of Safety, but a lot of Safety standards can be kept up by low cost. What about uninsured people?
As to not selling gas fittings in stores. Yes okay, only sell them to the customer on proof of gas work being undertaken with an indemnity that they will be installed when used according to the Gas Regs. That way it would stop unfair gas fitters charging what ever they liked for them.
In practice you can buy unstamped BS water fittings in stores even though it is illegal to use them.
Would not mind it being part of an insurance policy to get gas installations tested.
But would limit the cost a gas fitter could charge to about £5 to the customer and the rest paid by the insurance company. It may be amazing how many customers you would get if costs are low, even the DIY would find it cheaper to get you in.
Funny really how Safety and cost get all mixed up. Seems to me, a lot of money can be made out of Safety, but a lot of Safety standards can be kept up by low cost. What about uninsured people?
As to not selling gas fittings in stores. Yes okay, only sell them to the customer on proof of gas work being undertaken with an indemnity that they will be installed when used according to the Gas Regs. That way it would stop unfair gas fitters charging what ever they liked for them.
In practice you can buy unstamped BS water fittings in stores even though it is illegal to use them.
L
lambchop
Maybe Im a little too hardcore, in the way I cant imagine anyone buying a gas fitting who is not qualiffied to fit unless they are up to no good. When you need a new exhaust you dont go and buy it and then take it to the mechanic to fit. Government should get their 'balls' out of their mums handbag. Make it illegal to sell these fittings unless an I.D. card is presented and a hefty fine if a shop is caught doing it. It seems to have improved not selling alcohol to kids by toughening up some common sense laws, why not to gas....?
F
fuzzy
The reason why the d.i.y. stores are allowed to sell gas parts etc, enabling the d.i.y. er to put everybody at risk is because they went to court and argued the point that it is restrictive under the freedom of trade act to stop them from doing so! It goes to show how many people are doing there own work because they are selling lots of stuff at silly prices that no tradesman would pay unless a dire emergency on a sun aft. Spoke to a gas safe inspector about this and they said we have tried to stop this a number of times but they have chucked the towel in. Should invalidate house insurance if you dont have your gas apps serviced annually = good all round for everybody
just because somebody buys a gas part does not mean it is fitted illegally
B
Bernie2
Yes I suppose cost is the main factor why you get people doing DIY. Some do like doing it for a hobby mind. The cost of gas training for ACS and the likes do add on a lot to running costs for a small company. If however, you consider how much money is made by gas suppliers and appliance manufacturers who are reliant on appliances being fitted by gas fitters, isn't it fair to ask for a large contribution from them toward training and ACS costs?
We even get boiler manufaturers seeming to want to charge you for learning how to service their equipment they should be paying you for wanting to do it.
Lets be honest wouldyou sell motor cars if nobody had passed a driving test that was required by law?
Surely safety is the object of ACS and to learn how to work safely should cost next to nothing.
We even get boiler manufaturers seeming to want to charge you for learning how to service their equipment they should be paying you for wanting to do it.
Lets be honest wouldyou sell motor cars if nobody had passed a driving test that was required by law?
Surely safety is the object of ACS and to learn how to work safely should cost next to nothing.
Last edited by a moderator:
P
Puddle
Maybe more people would use a registered installer if the costs were lower, unfortunately with current ACS and Gas Safe costs the installer has to charge a lot.
Can you imagine the outcry if all car drivers had to re-take a driving test every five years.
What is the difference in cost from a unqualified tradesman in gas and a tradesman with his gas card,not that much I believe ?
Similar plumbing topics
- Question
Under the regulations, a supplier is not...
- Beyond the blue
- General DIY Plumbing Forum
- 8
- 970
- Latest:
- Basher
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 970
Ok I think I see what your saying mate,
So...
- sammy67
- Gas Engineers Forum
- 9
- 1K
- Latest:
- sammy67
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 1K
Ahhh that one it’s a nope from me failed...
- kasser
- Gas Engineers Forum
- 4
- 738
- Latest:
- ShaunCorbs
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 738
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 673