Permissible drop and TT | Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board | Page 2 | Plumbers Forums

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

  • Thread starter kirkgas
  • Start date
  • Replies 91
  • Views 2K

Discuss Permissible drop and TT in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at Plumbers Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.
Done my resit in jan asked the trainer that exact question as it seems different people have different views. I was always taught any drop you must confirm carcase is sound by isolating app and he said this was correct. I have had a 2 mb drop on a llords which had been passed for years and after some investigating I found a unsoldered but fluxed 15mm elbow behind kitchen carcase.amazing how well flux will hold and over a long period!
 
I have met a few installers that think this but you are not allowed any drop on any pipework new or old.

both of you are right but people need to read the complete posts and not extract bits of them or this will go on forever.
 
the book says you can leave a situation like this, but maybe the books wrong :disappointed:

a 2mb drop at 20mb would also show a drop on a 10mb let buy test.
if there's no drop at 10mb, you could be looking at a let buy on the ecv, with a gas leak equal to the let buy

so imo, only leave this situation if there's a drop on the 10mb let buy test as well :smile:
 
5.4 NEW EXTENSIONS/ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING INSTALLATIONS
Before commencing the new work, the existing installation shall be tightness tested in accordance with clause 5.3.2 and any permissible pressure drop over the 2 minute test period noted (see also Sub-Section 4.2).
Upon completion of the work to the existing system, the tightness test shall be repeated and the pressure loss after the 2 minute test period shall be no greater than that previously measured and there shall be no smell of gas.


You only "need" to do what you "need" to do. Whether you choose to work above the requirements is up to you and perhaps your wallet or conscience.

Put the scenario into a bit perspective here and think about it. How much gas would be released from a 2mb drop?
Cleverer people than us do some fancy sums and decide what would be safe or not safe. When they come up with what they think is a safe figure, we are talking really safe. Not about half of what would cause the house to blow up. We are talking many many times more on the safe side.

Since i don't need to get up in the morning and there is nothing worth watching on the telly, here is a sum (or calculation if you like that word better) that shows the amount of gas that would be released into a room with a 2mb drop.
The formula for working this out is
LR (leakage rate) = F3 (some clever people worked that out and it is a constant for the type of fuel) X GM (gauge movement) X IV (installation volume) ÷ TTD (tightness test duration)
stick some numbers in and
LR = 0.059 (a constant number for ng) X 2 (the gauge dropped 2mb) x 0.02 (a guess on the big side on this one) ÷ 2 (test time)
LR = 0.00236 ÷ 2 = 0.00118m³/hr


Now think of the EL's of ng, volume of any small space a pipe is allowed to pass through without being vented and think about the number of air changes that occur in an average domestic space.

I know how i would treat this (providing there "IS" no smell) without blinking an eye this but i know how to do fancy sums too and so do you now if you remember it.

Maybe this should be moved to the gsr section
 
I'd be doing the same calculation as you Tam, but only because that's what I learned with the commercial side.

To me a 2mbr drop on 2m of pipe would set the alarms off rather than it would on a 30m run because of the Iv.

Not comfortable with this in open forum either but it is useful for the new guys sitting their ACS so I'll shift it to the arms.
 
There's lots of talk of what the book says and what trainers have said but how many answering the original question have

1. Read the original question properly and

2. Read IGEM-UP-1B Ed3

The question is what is the legal requirement, not best practice or what your Auntie Hilda says.

The actual wording of the relevant paragraphs is

For all new installations (with or without appliances connected) or existing installations where no appliances are connected, if there is no perceptible movement (fall) of the gauge reading and there is no smell of gas the installation shall be deemed to have passed the test. Otherwise, the installation shall be deemed to have failed the test.

For existing installations where appliances are connected, if the pressure drop does not exceed the values given in table 3 and there is no smell of gas, the installation shall be deemed to have passed the test. Otherwise, the installation shall be deemed to have failed the test.

The inference is that the drop must be through an appliance but nowhere does it state that you need to prove this. It may be good practice to go beyond the legal requirement but you could be landing yourself in hot water by doing so. Suppose you carry out a LL check and find a 3 mbar drop. Being the concientious engineer that you are you go round and isolate all of the appliances and the drop is still there. You are now legally obliged to rectify the leak or make it safe. Unabgle to find the leak you disc the meter and leave the tenant with no heating, hot water or cooking facilities. The landlord goes ape and sues you. You may feel that you were doing the right thing but, legally, you have exceeded the legal requirement.

The correct method of dealing with the situation is to ask the tenant if they have noticed a smell of gas within the property and then proceed further if they say yes. 9 times out of 10 the tenant will reply in the affirmative and that is when you start isolating stuff to locate the source of the leak.

Before getting to this stage I'll normally give the meter unions a quick tweak as I find most small drops are slight weeps on the meter unions or at the outlet of the ECV.
 
Better to ask customer if they ever smell gas before you start any work.
They will say no if its true.
The second your looking for a leak they miraculously can smell gas and walk round the house sniffing like a dog.
 
I agree with mike, ask the cust before you start if they ever smell gas, then if its permissible drop then it is what it says on the tin "permissible"

What everyone considers good practice and safe practice is up to them regarding isolating appliances. Although I would ask the owners permission first.
 
Better to ask customer if they ever smell gas before you start any work.
They will say no if its true.
The second your looking for a leak they miraculously can smell gas and walk round the house sniffing like a dog.

So true, anyway it's 4 mbar isn't it?
 
For me the grey area is the fact that the carcuss can't be leaking, but how do you know unless you isolate appliances?
 
5.4 NEW EXTENSIONS/ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING INSTALLATIONS
Before commencing the new work, the existing installation shall be tightness tested in accordance with clause 5.3.2 and any permissible pressure drop over the 2 minute test period noted (see also Sub-Section 4.2).
Upon completion of the work to the existing system, the tightness test shall be repeated and the pressure loss after the 2 minute test period shall be no greater than that previously measured and there shall be no smell of gas.


You only "need" to do what you "need" to do. Whether you choose to work above the requirements is up to you and perhaps your wallet or conscience.

Put the scenario into a bit perspective here and think about it. How much gas would be released from a 2mb drop?
Cleverer people than us do some fancy sums and decide what would be safe or not safe. When they come up with what they think is a safe figure, we are talking really safe. Not about half of what would cause the house to blow up. We are talking many many times more on the safe side.

Since i don't need to get up in the morning and there is nothing worth watching on the telly, here is a sum (or calculation if you like that word better) that shows the amount of gas that would be released into a room with a 2mb drop.
The formula for working this out is
LR (leakage rate) = F3 (some clever people worked that out and it is a constant for the type of fuel) X GM (gauge movement) X IV (installation volume) ÷ TTD (tightness test duration)
stick some numbers in and
LR = 0.059 (a constant number for ng) X 2 (the gauge dropped 2mb) x 0.02 (a guess on the big side on this one) ÷ 2 (test time)
LR = 0.00236 ÷ 2 = 0.00118m³/hr


Now think of the EL's of ng, volume of any small space a pipe is allowed to pass through without being vented and think about the number of air changes that occur in an average domestic space.

I know how i would treat this (providing there "IS" no smell) without blinking an eye this but i know how to do fancy sums too and so do you now if you remember it.

Maybe this should be moved to the gsr section

It's not just the gas released you haveto worry about.
There's another safety critical issuethat might cause a problem,


The clever people that do the fancysums your talking about, are not as clever as they would have usbelieve :disappointed:


all will be revealed later :hurray:
 
For me the grey area is the fact that the carcuss can't be leaking, but how do you know unless you isolate appliances?

But the carcass can be leaking if there are appliances connected. The inference from IGEM-UP-1B Ed3 is that the carcass can't be leaking but nowhere does it say that.
 
It's not just the gas released you haveto worry about.
There's another safety critical issuethat might cause a problem,


The clever people that do the fancysums your talking about, are not as clever as they would have usbelieve :disappointed:


all will be revealed later :hurray:
Oven bypass flame?
 
We all know you can't have a known leak on pipework, what the relevance of service valves?

You have a point there, now I'm confused. Is a drop allowed on existing pipework [with appliances fitted] or not?
 
There's lots of talk of what the book says and what trainers have said but how many answering the original question have

1. Read the original question properly and

2. Read IGEM-UP-1B Ed3

The question is what is the legal requirement, not best practice or what your Auntie Hilda says.

The actual wording of the relevant paragraphs is



The inference is that the drop must be through an appliance but nowhere does it state that you need to prove this. It may be good practice to go beyond the legal requirement but you could be landing yourself in hot water by doing so. Suppose you carry out a LL check and find a 3 mbar drop. Being the concientious engineer that you are you go round and isolate all of the appliances and the drop is still there. You are now legally obliged to rectify the leak or make it safe. Unabgle to find the leak you disc the meter and leave the tenant with no heating, hot water or cooking facilities. The landlord goes ape and sues you. You may feel that you were doing the right thing but, legally, you have exceeded the legal requirement.

The correct method of dealing with the situation is to ask the tenant if they have noticed a smell of gas within the property and then proceed further if they say yes. 9 times out of 10 the tenant will reply in the affirmative and that is when you start isolating stuff to locate the source of the leak.

Before getting to this stage I'll normally give the meter unions a quick tweak as I find most small drops are slight weeps on the meter unions or at the outlet of the ECV.

Mike, the best reply yet, ( because you agreed with me hahaha)
Seriously the scenario you gave is EXACTLY the scenario I use with students, I always start by demanding they tell me the exact requirement under regs, I have no interest in what they want to do above that, until we speak to the customer or client etc
And I have no interest in what they believe is better practice, the question is what MUST be done
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar plumbing topics

Ok I think I see what your saying mate, So...
Replies
9
Views
1K
M
We have to make the installation safe anyway...
Replies
34
Views
525
Martin, I don't think the old rad was venting...
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
15K
    • Like
  • Locked
The lack of knowledge and basic physics is on...
Replies
20
Views
533
lame plumber
L
M
    • Like
  • Locked
Hahaha i remember something about 200ppm but...
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
Whyme
W
Back
Top