So what you are saying cr0ft is that their apprenticeship last for just one year then?
I don't think I've said that anywhere at all, I think you've said I've said that 🙂
It's foolish to make blanket statements like 'exploitation' and other things as each apprentice needs to be assessed on a case by case basis. There are many 'fully qualified' plumbers I've seen who I would not have working in my house again, I would happily have this guy working in it.
There would be no point in me sending staff out on jobs before they are ready as it would dent his confidence and harm my reputation.
You can't tell me that no firm sends apprentices out on jobs on their own, it happens regularly around here. No harm in it at all when they are ready and capable in my opinion.
You are right cr0ft it was foolish of me & once again it shows me the inherent problems with this type of communication.
As we do, I made some assumptions based on your previous postings which were clearly incorrect.
In my mind a 2nd year apprentice is 17 - 18 years a lot different, as you say, to someone in there mid twenties.
You did suggest that his productivity determining his rate of pay which I would not necessarily agree with having seen a number of firm who clearly do exploit them.
It is clear from your full & well put post in response, that you do not exploit them & train them correctly, including letting them work on there own when ready. (they don't seem to do PJ's like we did, which as you say, is where I learnt the most important lessons in plumbing).
Sorry Cr0ft !!! & thank you for pointing out the error of my ways. Chris