If manufacturers offered boilers with high modulation ratios then IMO this would cover most demands without the added expense of a buffered system, manufacturers like Vokera offered 10:1 modulation years ago I think, if you had a heat only boiler with a heat requirement of say 15kw then a 10:1 ratio will give a minimum output of 1.5 kw, some manufacturers as well basically fit the same burner to a range of boilers to keep manufacturing costs down and because the minimum output is governed by the burner size/characteristics then one might only get a effective modulation ratio of say 3:1 at the lower lower end of their power range but a effective modulation ratio of say 6:1 at the higher end of their power range. Combi boilers present a bigger challenge as the HW demand can be well over twice the CH demand and buffering may be the only realistic solution here but sort of defeats the purpose of the combi. I know two people who changed from oil to gas who found it very hard to understand/accept that their constantly cycling oil boiler gave better temperature control than their new gas boiler, at very low heat demands.
Having said that it does seem that some makes of gas boilers can perform better than other makes when cycling, all seem to perform fine as long as operating in their modulation range.
[automerge]1578687456[/automerge]
Your first "bullet" point: is your room temperature at its SP temperature, with cycling?
Point2 & 3 seem to be stating that with the room stats at 25C that the boiler only runs for 8 minutes and with the room stats at 35C that the boiler runs for 35 minutes, this is very strange if one assumes that the room stat hasn't been satisfied in either case.
Excuse my ignorance, but I assume BF75 refers to the boiler flow temperature and HW60 refers to the hot water cylinder stat SP?